M11: what the server will actually read

The release-validation milestone, and the thing it had to settle first was
whether any of the earlier evidence meant what it said. M8 measured a deployment
enforcing a 4,096-token input window while the application budgeted 16,384.
Every request returned 200. What Ollama does with the excess is drop the oldest
tokens, and the oldest tokens here are the system block — the narrator's rules
and the campaign canon. A hundred-turn certification against that server would
have looked perfect and proved nothing, which is why this milestone could not
begin with a hundred turns.

So the application asks now. Ollama's window is a property of how a model was
loaded rather than of the request — sending num_ctx is accepted, ignored, and
worse, reloads the model at the server's own default — so the only honest move
is to find out and then tell the truth about it. /api/ps reports what a resident
model is being served with, /api/show what an unloaded one will load with, both
on the same host inference already uses, through the same endpoint policy and
the same TLS trust store. A verified window is a ceiling on the budget; an
unverified one leaves the budget alone and is recorded as unverified in the
turn's own provenance, so an old turn can be asked afterwards whether it was
built against a checked window. There is no third behaviour, and in particular
no hard-coded 4,096: a number the server did not say would be right on one
machine and wrong on the next.

The proof that this is doing something is a campaign whose canon sits at the
front of the prompt, 120 turns of history, and a 4,096-token window. The canon
is still there afterwards and the oldest history is gone. The same campaign
built the old way produces a prompt more than twice the window — the defect,
reproduced, so the fix is measured against it rather than asserted.

Two defects the validation found on its own, and they are the same defect twice:
something was true and nobody was told. A manual state correction of four
changes with one bad reference applied three, returned 201, and said nothing —
while recording the refusal on the audit row nobody reads. It came to light
because the identity diagnostic's own fixture was refused that way and the whole
run proceeded on a campaign with no scene, which would have read as a model
failure. And the narration-length setting moved no number: brief, medium and
long each became one English sentence, while the numeric hint the model actually
reads was derived from the global reply cap and said the same thing for all
three. Both now say what they did.

The other two post-M8 findings are closed as well. The tab said AI D&D, which no
document had ever claimed it did not; it says Interactive Story now, with the
open campaign first, and the name is the owner's decision rather than a
find-and-replace to something narrower than the engine. After an Undo the reader
could not tell where they had landed; the control row now ends with
"Moment 11 · later story ahead", from the server's own answer, in the word the
transcript already uses, with none of head, branch or depth anywhere near it.

The identity diagnostic exists and the root cause does not. That campaign was
destroyed, so no cause can be established — what M11 owes the finding is
something that can classify the next occurrence, and a diagnostic that makes only
the judgements a program can honestly make: duplicate keys, shared names,
protagonist drift, state and context disagreeing. Whether prose misattributed a
line is left to a person reading it beside its prompt, because a regex cannot
read dialogue and one that pretended to would produce exactly the confident wrong
answer this finding is about. Its detectors are proved to fire against a planted
second Alice.

Two entities may still share a display name. That was checked first, as the
finding asked, and left permitted: a mother and a daughter, or a stranger giving
a false name, are ordinary fiction, and refusing them to guard against a model
mistake would refuse the wrong thing. What was missing was that it happened
silently. It is reported now.

Evidence, not inference: a hundred accepted turns against a real narrator with
genuine process restarts; a real browser against the built SPA; a container with
no network at all; a campaign moved into a data directory that never existed.
Each was discarded and re-run whenever the product changed under it, and the runs
that were thrown away are listed in the report with the reason, along with ten
defects in the harnesses themselves — because a harness that has only ever
agreed with itself is not evidence, and two of M8's five harness defects were
masking real ones.

No dependency was added, removed or upgraded. No acceptance test was retired,
relaxed or reclassified. M11 is implemented and verified; it is not accepted, and
there is no release tag.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qyn3oRd4D6pi72nKBG725B

backend/app/routers/adventures/crud.py

@@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ def create_adventure(
         persona_name=payload.persona_name.strip(),
         persona_pronouns=payload.persona_pronouns.strip(),
         persona_desc=payload.persona_desc.strip(),
+        # M11: the reader's narration-length choice, kept as data so the prompt
+        # builder can turn it into a word range (post-M8 finding C).
+        narration_length=payload.narration_length,
     )
     db.add(adventure)
     db.flush()

backend/app/routers/adventures/insights.py

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ from fastapi import Depends, HTTPException
 from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
 
 from ... import derived, memorybank, models, summaries
+from ... import contextwindow
 from ...context import ContextOverflow, build_context
 from ...database import get_db
 from ...knowledge import retrieval as knowledge_retrieval
@@ -29,9 +30,13 @@ async def dry_run_context(
     # that skipped the library would show a prompt the next turn will not send,
     # which is the one thing this panel must never do.
     knowledge = await knowledge_retrieval.retrieve(adventure, settings)
+    # M11: and by the same probe the turn makes, for the same reason — a panel
+    # that showed a 16,384-token budget while the next turn will be capped to
+    # 4,096 would be showing a prompt that is not the one about to be sent.
+    window = await contextwindow.probe(settings.endpoint_url, settings.model)
     try:
         _, _, report = build_context(
-            adventure, settings, memories, knowledge=knowledge
+            adventure, settings, memories, knowledge=knowledge, window=window
         )
     except ContextOverflow as exc:
         # M6: a dry run of a prompt that cannot be built is still an answer, and

backend/app/routers/adventures/state.py

@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ def read_state(
         # The raw document, for the correction form to name a key with and for a
         # test to assert on without parsing prose.
         document=state,
+        duplicate_names=narrative.model.duplicate_names(state),
     )
 
 
@@ -95,6 +96,16 @@ def correct_state(
         )
         if not review.accepted:
             raise HTTPException(400, _refusal_message(review))
+        # M11: a correction can be partly refused — one bad reference among four
+        # good changes — and until M11 that came back as an unqualified success.
+        # Partial application is the deliberate behaviour (`validate.py`: losing
+        # three good changes to one typo is worse), so what M11 adds is the
+        # telling, not a change of behaviour.
+        refused = [
+            {"event": rejection.event, "reason": rejection.reason,
+             "detail": rejection.detail}
+            for rejection in review.rejected
+        ]
 
         node = head.node_at(db, adventure, adventure.head_depth)
         new_state, _proposal = narrative.store.record(
@@ -120,11 +131,14 @@ def correct_state(
     finally:
         turns._active_turns.discard(adventure_id)
 
-    view = narrative.render.for_inspector(narrative.store.current(adventure))
+    state_now = narrative.store.current(adventure)
+    view = narrative.render.for_inspector(state_now)
     return schemas.NarrativeStateOut(
         groups=[schemas.StateGroup(**group) for group in view["groups"]],
         empty=view["empty"],
-        document=narrative.store.current(adventure),
+        document=state_now,
+        duplicate_names=narrative.model.duplicate_names(state_now),
+        refused=refused,
     )
 
 

backend/app/routers/adventures/turns.py

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ from ... import (
     attempts, head, limits, memorybank, models, narrative, schemas, tree,
     worldstate,
 )
+from ... import contextwindow
 from ...context import ContextOverflow, build_context, cursors
 from ...knowledge import retrieval as knowledge_retrieval
 from ...database import get_db
@@ -202,6 +203,12 @@ async def _generate_turn(
     knowledge = await knowledge_retrieval.retrieve(
         adventure, settings, exclude_action_id=replacing_id
     )
+    # M11: what this server will actually accept. Asked here rather than inside
+    # the builder for the same reason retrieval is — the builder makes no
+    # network calls — and cached per endpoint and model, so it costs one short
+    # request per session rather than one per turn. An unverified window does
+    # not block the turn; it is recorded as unverified in the snapshot below.
+    window = await contextwindow.probe(settings.endpoint_url, settings.model)
     try:
         system_text, story_text, snapshot = build_context(
             adventure,
@@ -209,6 +216,7 @@ async def _generate_turn(
             memories,
             exclude_action_id=replacing_id,
             knowledge=knowledge,
+            window=window,
         )
     except ContextOverflow as exc:
         # M6: the protected context does not fit in the configured budget, so