Planning v3.9: record M11's long-run evidence, and correct what v3.7 claimed

The planning package still described M01 as outstanding. It now records the
evidence run on 96c1bf5 and the two product defects found on the way. It also
corrects three statements that were never true.

- V1-ACCEPTANCE-TESTS.md: result blocks for M01-M04. M04 is recorded as
  recovered through authoritative state, with the owner's acceptance of that on
  2026-09-13 and the positional precondition explained.
  Correction: v3.7 said this file carried M11 results against every REQUIRED
  test. None were written, and the per-test matrix is the M11 report's §F. The
  §P3 M11 disposition said the report records the identity diagnostic's
  findings. It does not, and the disposition now says so.
- BUILD-MILESTONES.md: the M11 status block records the long-run evidence,
  the write-lock and protocol-leak defects, and what is left for the reviewer.
- DATA-MODEL.md §28B: M11 added two columns, not one.
  settings.context_window_override (migration 94, ef25b0a) was never
  recorded.
- TECHNICAL-DESIGN.md: "Background failure observability" gains the rule
  that nothing in a turn writes before the model call, and new §15.4 records
  that stored narration carries story only, with the extractor's rules.
- CONTEXT-AND-MEMORY.md §51 and ADR 013: as-implemented notes for the same
  two fixes.
- README.md and VERSION.md: status, milestone map, stop rule, and the v3.9
  entry.
- M11 report §Q: the "not revised" note is replaced by what v3.9 revised.

No requirement changes. No code changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136VBTMUKWYeU6G9HgbDbND
This commit is contained in:
JesseMarkowitz
2026-09-14 03:22:14 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent d1988065e5
commit 3652dc6fae
9 changed files with 206 additions and 18 deletions
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ Each stage has one job, and the order is deliberate: the allowlist is checked
before any field is read, so an unknown event type is rejected before its
contents are touched.
**Implementation note (post-M11).** "The protocol block is separated from the
prose" covers more than one fenced block. A small local model also pastes the
rendered state into its prose, writes its proposal unfenced or quoted, and runs
out of tokens partway through it. All of that is removed before the prose is
stored, because stored prose is replayed as history. `TECHNICAL-DESIGN.md` §15.4
has the rules.
### Where it lives
- `adventures.narrative_state` — the current authoritative document. This is