Docs: consolidate active planning and archive historical material
The planning package had grown to where a new agent could not tell what was authoritative. Phase 0 execution prompts sat beside the specification; four completed milestone reports sat beside the current one; and upstream AI-DnD's own `plan/` build log and `docs/` project site still described a hosted, scripted, multi-user product with accounts — every screenshot in it showed a Scripts tab and a Sign up button, none of which has existed since M2. `planning/archive/` now holds the history and says so in its own README: `phase0/` for the research that chose AI-DnD, `milestone-reports/` for M1 and M2, `decisions/` for ADR 008, the Phase-0-before-build gate Phase 0 satisfied. `planning/reports/` holds only the current milestone's report, because that is the one M4 planning has to read; it moves to the archive when M4's replaces it. Deleted rather than archived: the Phase 0B execution prompts and the handoff/status/summary documents, the Phase 0A discovery and triage reports, upstream's `plan/` and `docs/` trees, and `frontend/README.md`, which was Vite's template boilerplate. All of it is in Git history, and the two recommendation reports carry every conclusion the deleted research reached. Archived documents are kept verbatim. Paths written inside them point at where those files were when the document was written, which is the point: an evidence record that has been quietly edited is no longer evidence. Active documentation is corrected where it pointed at the removed trees or described removed capability as present. `DEVELOPMENT.md`'s "things M1 did not touch" list had gone stale at M2 and claimed QuickJS scripting was still tested; its test count was 604 against an actual 638. `README.md` loses the upstream CI badge, which reported upstream's pipeline rather than this fork's, and a reference to `backend/app/worldstate/engine.py`, a file that does not exist. `planning/README.md` is rewritten as the documentation index. New: `planning/PROJECT-SOURCES.md` and `planning/project-sources.txt`, the manifest of what belongs in the ChatGPT project's Sources. Source comments referring to the deleted trees are reworded; no behaviour changes. 638 backend tests pass, frontend lints and builds, and a reference scan over all 48 tracked Markdown files reports no unresolved path in active documentation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NCbwH7yLGKsj1rhXXzKSCu
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
c8755c21c2
commit
d27ee34901
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# React + Vite
|
||||
|
||||
This template provides a minimal setup to get React working in Vite with HMR and some Oxlint rules.
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, two official plugins are available:
|
||||
|
||||
- [@vitejs/plugin-react](https://github.com/vitejs/vite-plugin-react/blob/main/packages/plugin-react) uses [Oxc](https://oxc.rs)
|
||||
- [@vitejs/plugin-react-swc](https://github.com/vitejs/vite-plugin-react/blob/main/packages/plugin-react-swc) uses [SWC](https://swc.rs/)
|
||||
|
||||
## React Compiler
|
||||
|
||||
The React Compiler is not enabled on this template because of its impact on dev & build performances. To add it, see [this documentation](https://react.dev/learn/react-compiler/installation).
|
||||
|
||||
## Expanding the Oxlint configuration
|
||||
|
||||
If you are developing a production application, use TypeScript with type-aware lint rules enabled. See the [TS template](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/main/packages/create-vite/template-react-ts) for how to integrate TypeScript and Oxlint's TypeScript-related rules in your project.
|
||||
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
|
||||
* imports below.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The page component still owns all of the session state. Lifting it into a
|
||||
* `usePlaySession` hook waits for Stage 5 of `plan/17-refactor.md`, which adds
|
||||
* a frontend test runner. Moving eighteen `useState` calls and seven
|
||||
* `usePlaySession` hook waits for the frontend test runner M8 adds
|
||||
* (`planning/BUILD-MILESTONES.md`). Moving eighteen `useState` calls and seven
|
||||
* `useEffect` calls is a rewrite rather than a move, and nothing would catch a
|
||||
* mistake in it today.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user