A memory whose block ends on the newest action is the one memory a player
can reach: retry and take-switching both refuse anything else. Each retry
of that turn withdrew the memory and wrote it again, and a block closes
every six actions while a normal turn writes two, so that was one turn in
three.
SETTLE_SLACK asks for one action past a block before the block is
summarized. The block is still MEMORY_INTERVAL actions; only the moment
moves. This is not the pre-SP4 holdback returning: that one was about a
retry rewriting text in place, which sibling attempts and forget_node
settled, and correctness still rests on the withdrawal rather than on the
slack. Undo and delete can carry a summarized node back to the tip, so the
withdrawal path stays reachable, just rarely.
The slack buys nothing back. The block that just closed is still in the
history window in full, so a memory of it says what the model can already
read.
Tests: the settling suite asserts the new rule and that a retry at the tip
finds nothing to withdraw; the rewrite suite builds thirteen actions so
both of its blocks settle; the one path test that ended on a block boundary
sets the slack to zero, because it is about which actions a block is read
from rather than about when a block forms. 632 green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015NcrxCJjqgDvAkamKeLWdn
Migrations 66 to 73 drop `actions.index`, `variants`, `variant_index`,
`variant_count`, `state_before`, and `world_state_before`, plus
`adventures.memory_cursor` and `summary_cursor`. `index` is a keyword in
SQLite, so migration 71 quotes it.
Nothing outside the migrations read these. `models.py`, `schemas.py`, and
`ACTION_LIST_COLUMNS` lose the same eight fields, `Adventure.actions` orders
by `id`, and `attempts.renumber`, `context.history.max_action_index`, and
`nodes.next_index` are deleted.
Two changes keep the migration replayable on a `create_all` database:
- `_split_variants_into_siblings` wrote through the live ORM table, so it
stopped compiling once migration 66 removed five of its columns. It now
writes through `_ACTIONS_AT_60`, a frozen `Table` with its own `MetaData`.
- Five data passes read columns these migrations drop. Each now calls
`_has_columns` and returns early when the columns are absent.
`bootstrap` takes a `through` version so a migration test can stop at the
schema it asserts on.
555 tests pass, up from 549. Eight of the new cases assert each column is
gone after a real schema-45 database migrates all the way.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0198qDK3gmgSo7EtQ4GTPqqK
Every test module carried the same eight-line prologue redirecting the
database to a temp file. Only the first one to be imported ever took
effect: `app.database` reads `AIDND_DB_PATH` at import and builds `engine`
from it once, so by the time the second module ran the engine already
existed. The other 34 copies created a temp file that nothing opened and
nothing deleted, and leaked one per module per run.
`conftest.py` now does it once, which is early enough because pytest
imports conftest before any test module. It also deletes the file when the
run ends. The tests still share one database, exactly as they already did:
each `client` fixture calls `create_all` on setup and `drop_all` on
teardown, so no test sees another test's rows.
`tests/fakes.py` holds the one `ScriptedProvider`. Nine modules each had a
copy, and the copies had drifted into four feature sets, so a test that
needed to raise a provider error had to be written in one of the files
whose copy supported that. The shared one is the superset. The two
`FakeProvider` copies were the same class with a fixed reply, so they use
it too. `test_chat.py` keeps its own, which implements `chat` rather than
`generate` and records what it was constructed with.
An autouse fixture resets the fake's class state between tests, so a stale
reply list can no longer reach the next test.
435 lines out of the suite. 549 tests pass. Verified live by sabotage:
breaking the shared fake fails 13 tests across four modules.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014Dix4oGV3njgWRdu7P9t6r
* Rewrite comments in Google developer documentation style
Rewrite the comments and docstrings across the backend core modules so they
read plainly. The previous prose was accurate but dense and figurative, which
made it slow to skim.
Applies the Google developer documentation style guide: short sentences, active
voice, present tense, American spelling, and no metaphors, idioms, or
rhetorical asides. Replaces em-dash chains with separate sentences.
Every attempt at a turn is now its own row at the same (branch, depth),
with `live` naming the one the story tells. The JSON repeating group on
`actions.variants` is read one last time, by a migration that writes it
out as the sibling rows it always described, and then goes unread.
The snapshots turn around with it: an action carries the state it left
behind rather than the state it started from, because attempts at one
turn share a starting position and differ exactly in their outcome.
Rolling back is "what the node in front left behind", one lookup on the
path, and it is what undo and retry now both read.
And the memory holdback goes. It existed because retry rewrote a row
under a mark that had already moved past it; a retry writes a sibling
now, and replacing what a coordinate says withdraws what was derived
from it — the same repair undo and delete already made.
The assembled prompt is still stored once per turn: it moves with the
live flag, so a superseded attempt keeps only the few hundred bytes that
were its own. Measured on the 600-action fixture: 700 rows for the same
600-turn story, prompt archive byte-identical at 0.50 MB, index 1.8 kB
and page load 62.7 kB unmoved.
347 tests green. `tests/test_story_tree_baseline.py` and
`tests/test_retry_variants.py` pass unmodified — SP4 was allowed to move
the baseline for the variant-count semantics and did not need to.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
The memory bank and the story summary each kept a cursor: how many story
actions they had already covered. A count is a position in a list, and this
list moves — delete an action in front of the mark and every later one slides
down a slot, so the mark now covers one it has never read. All the cursor
bookkeeping existed to patch that up.
Both marks are now (branch_id, depth): the node up to and including which the
work is done. A depth is a coordinate along a path, not an offset into a list,
so nothing in front of it can move it. That deletes rather than rewrites
`position_of_index`, `note_action_removed`, `_rewind_cursors_to_index`,
`prune_dangling_memories` and the every-pass clamp in `run_post_turn`.
A memory hangs off the node its block ends on, so a fork inherits its
ancestors' memories without copying any, and retrieval selects through the
branch clause over the *whole* lineage — recall is long-range by definition and
cannot be windowed. Measured: 1,807 B on a story forked twenty times against
1,823 B on a flat one of the same length.
Migrations 53-56 translate the old counts into nodes. They rewrite `adventures`
and not `actions`, so this one needs no VACUUM FULL.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
Three fallout bugs from keeping the retried action row alive (906ba42),
plus two long-standing cursor bugs the same investigation turned up.
Retry context leak: the row being regenerated is still attached to the
adventure, so it was replayed as established story and the model wrote a
continuation of the attempt it was meant to replace — the story visibly
blended both takes. It leaked into four places, not one: history replay,
story-card trigger matching, in-scene NPC detection, and the memory-bank
similarity query. Adds a shared context.story_actions(exclude_action_id),
threaded through build_context and retrieve_memories.
Memory holdback: a memory could summarize the just-generated turn; retry
rewrites Action.text but memory_cursor has already advanced, so the memory
was never regenerated and went on describing narration no longer in the
story. settled_story_actions() holds the newest action back one turn —
only the last action is retryable, so that makes it unreachable. The
settled list is always a prefix, so cursors stay valid and nothing is
skipped. The run_post_turn clamp deliberately still uses the full count:
clamping to settled rewinds legacy adventures a step and double-covers an
action.
Cursor bookkeeping: memory_cursor is a position into story_actions() while
Memory.source_* are Action.index values, and the two diverge as soon as
anything is deleted. Deleting a middle action slid a never-summarized
action into the covered range, skipping it forever; and pruning a memory
left the actions it covered stranded behind the cursor. Adds
note_action_removed() (called before the delete in delete_action and
undo_turn) and a rewind in prune_dangling_memories. delete_action also
now prunes at all, which it never did.
Not addressed: editing an already-summarized action still leaves its
memory stale, and the cumulative story summary can't have one fact
un-mixed from it.
117 backend tests pass, including new test_memory_settling.py (12) and
two retry-context regression tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UeQVy5bEjLhfgWNc27Efet
Claude