10d8a988ca82c81510280bb2f8d3bc85932719dd
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
144406cd48 |
M11: what the server will actually read
The release-validation milestone, and the thing it had to settle first was whether any of the earlier evidence meant what it said. M8 measured a deployment enforcing a 4,096-token input window while the application budgeted 16,384. Every request returned 200. What Ollama does with the excess is drop the oldest tokens, and the oldest tokens here are the system block — the narrator's rules and the campaign canon. A hundred-turn certification against that server would have looked perfect and proved nothing, which is why this milestone could not begin with a hundred turns. So the application asks now. Ollama's window is a property of how a model was loaded rather than of the request — sending num_ctx is accepted, ignored, and worse, reloads the model at the server's own default — so the only honest move is to find out and then tell the truth about it. /api/ps reports what a resident model is being served with, /api/show what an unloaded one will load with, both on the same host inference already uses, through the same endpoint policy and the same TLS trust store. A verified window is a ceiling on the budget; an unverified one leaves the budget alone and is recorded as unverified in the turn's own provenance, so an old turn can be asked afterwards whether it was built against a checked window. There is no third behaviour, and in particular no hard-coded 4,096: a number the server did not say would be right on one machine and wrong on the next. The proof that this is doing something is a campaign whose canon sits at the front of the prompt, 120 turns of history, and a 4,096-token window. The canon is still there afterwards and the oldest history is gone. The same campaign built the old way produces a prompt more than twice the window — the defect, reproduced, so the fix is measured against it rather than asserted. Two defects the validation found on its own, and they are the same defect twice: something was true and nobody was told. A manual state correction of four changes with one bad reference applied three, returned 201, and said nothing — while recording the refusal on the audit row nobody reads. It came to light because the identity diagnostic's own fixture was refused that way and the whole run proceeded on a campaign with no scene, which would have read as a model failure. And the narration-length setting moved no number: brief, medium and long each became one English sentence, while the numeric hint the model actually reads was derived from the global reply cap and said the same thing for all three. Both now say what they did. The other two post-M8 findings are closed as well. The tab said AI D&D, which no document had ever claimed it did not; it says Interactive Story now, with the open campaign first, and the name is the owner's decision rather than a find-and-replace to something narrower than the engine. After an Undo the reader could not tell where they had landed; the control row now ends with "Moment 11 · later story ahead", from the server's own answer, in the word the transcript already uses, with none of head, branch or depth anywhere near it. The identity diagnostic exists and the root cause does not. That campaign was destroyed, so no cause can be established — what M11 owes the finding is something that can classify the next occurrence, and a diagnostic that makes only the judgements a program can honestly make: duplicate keys, shared names, protagonist drift, state and context disagreeing. Whether prose misattributed a line is left to a person reading it beside its prompt, because a regex cannot read dialogue and one that pretended to would produce exactly the confident wrong answer this finding is about. Its detectors are proved to fire against a planted second Alice. Two entities may still share a display name. That was checked first, as the finding asked, and left permitted: a mother and a daughter, or a stranger giving a false name, are ordinary fiction, and refusing them to guard against a model mistake would refuse the wrong thing. What was missing was that it happened silently. It is reported now. Evidence, not inference: a hundred accepted turns against a real narrator with genuine process restarts; a real browser against the built SPA; a container with no network at all; a campaign moved into a data directory that never existed. Each was discarded and re-run whenever the product changed under it, and the runs that were thrown away are listed in the report with the reason, along with ten defects in the harnesses themselves — because a harness that has only ever agreed with itself is not evidence, and two of M8's five harness defects were masking real ones. No dependency was added, removed or upgraded. No acceptance test was retired, relaxed or reclassified. M11 is implemented and verified; it is not accepted, and there is no release tag. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qyn3oRd4D6pi72nKBG725B |
||
|
JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
480414efe0 |
M7: a first-class imported knowledge library
A campaign can import local .txt and .md files as Canon, Reference or Inspiration, and the class is load-bearing rather than a label: it decides the words a passage is framed with in the prompt, the weight it carries when passages are ranked, and which budget it competes in when the context is tight. This is a separate subsystem, which is the Phase 0B decision (IMPORTED-KNOWLEDGE-DESIGN.md §73). Story Cards do not carry classification, provenance, content identity, chunking, an index or a lifecycle, and they were not promoted into something that does. Nothing here reads or writes one. The subsystem, in backend/app/knowledge/: classes the three classes, their weights, and the prompt framing chunking deterministic, heading-aware, 60-800 tokens, no overlap fts SQLite FTS5 with porter stemming; scoped and bounded in SQL importer validate, hash, store, chunk, index — in one transaction embeddings local Ollama vectors through the shared provider retrieval query construction, hybrid merge, rerank inject the budgeted cut and the rendered prompt sections Relevance admission is a separate stage from ranking, and that separation is the milestone's most expensive lesson. An independent review found the first implementation deciding relevance with a floor expressed as a share of the best candidate — which the best clears by construction — so a passage was admitted on every turn regardless of the scene. A query about tide tables and container tonnage retrieved all five sources of a fantasy campaign, narrator-only hidden Canon among them. So the pipeline is now: candidate generation -> admission -> ranking -> class weighting -> budget Admission reads raw, candidate-set-independent signals: the cosine the model returned, and how many distinct meaningful query terms a passage contains. Ranking reads normalized ones, because bm25 has no fixed range and cosine's zero is not zero. Normalization decides order among things that matched; it can never decide whether anything matched. Authority is applied after admission, so a class orders what matched and never rescues what did not. Retrieval may therefore return nothing, and on a scene unrelated to the library it does. The other decisions that each replaced an obvious wrong one: - The class multiplies relevance rather than adding to it. An additive bonus satisfies "Canon outranks Reference" and makes "do not include irrelevant Canon" impossible, because a large enough constant wins on its own. - The semantic floor is measured, not guessed: 113 production-path pairs against nomic-embed-text put targeted matches at 0.55-0.85 and off-topic pairs at 0.36-0.56, and 0.58 sits between them. Because it is a property of that model and not of cosine similarity, it is keyed to the model rather than applied to whatever is configured: an embedding model with no measured calibration in this build does not borrow the number. Semantic admission is skipped, the campaign retrieves lexically, and the reason is stated in the knowledge status and in the turn's provenance. Degrading to lexical keeps the library usable; lending the threshold to an unmeasured model is how the admitted-everything defect would return. - One lexical term is not evidence. Two distinct meaningful terms, or one that is neither a standing campaign entity nor a negligible share of the query. The stop list grew from 42 words to 261, all function words — no subject matter, because a stop list that removes subject matter stops finding "The Silver Key". - Lexical retrieval is a production path, not a fallback. It finds the proper nouns and invented terms a setting bible is made of, and the library is fully usable with no embedding model configured. Safety is structural rather than filtered. Imported text reaches the prompt whole, inside a section that says what it is, under a rule stating the authority order in words and refusing every instruction inside it. No endpoint accepts a filesystem path, so H08 has no mechanism to escape from. Nothing renders imported content as HTML, so a script tag is five visible characters and a remote image is never fetched. Import, chunking, indexing, retrieval and a turn open no socket at all; only embeddings do, through the endpoint allowlist the memory bank already uses. Provenance is the rendered text, not a foreign key: deleting a source cannot turn a historical turn's evidence into dangling ids. Schema: knowledge_sources, knowledge_chunks, knowledge_embeddings, and an FTS5 virtual table attached to knowledge_chunks as a DDL hook so it is created and dropped with the table it indexes. Migration 92. A pre-M7 database opens unchanged and needs no sources to play. Bundle: the source content and the reader's judgements about it travel; the passages, index rows and vectors are rebuilt on import, so a restored campaign is searchable immediately without a reindex step. One runtime dependency: python-multipart, Starlette's multipart parser. It is what makes the upload surface possible, and the upload surface is why no pathname is ever accepted. The test doubles were the reason the defect shipped, so they were corrected too. The retrieval stub scored unrelated text at 0.06-0.20 where the real model scores it at 0.43-0.44, and its docstring said it had deliberately removed the constant component that "would put a similarity floor under every pair" — which is exactly the property real models have. The stub now has that floor, one test fails if it is ever removed, and another reproduces the superseded rule and asserts it is still fooled by the same fixture. Run against the pre-corrective implementation, the new suite fails 13 of 18. Tests: 939 passed, 14 skipped (836/7 at M6). 110 new across seven files, one of which mocks nothing between itself and Ollama and re-measures the similarity separation on every run. 43/43 checks in a real Firefox, reproduced. Docker build clean. Four other defects found by review or by the browser run were fixed here rather than carried: an unreachable relevance constant that appeared to enforce something and did not; acceptance tests using the wrong fixture files, so G07's trap was never exercised; a bidirectional override surviving into displayed filenames; and, from the implementation pass, the Insights panel showing M5's two state sections as raw keys and the source inspector refetching on every keystroke. M7 was independently reviewed, which returned PASS WITH CORRECTIVE WORK REQUIRED. Both blocking findings are closed, and closeout resolved the embedding-model calibration boundary the corrective pass had left as debt. planning/reports/M7-IMPLEMENTATION-REPORT.md carries the review, the corrective closeout and the closeout verification in sequence, none overwriting another. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017HdaXiFbscatQaLS7dJk6b |