Retrieval has been path-scoped since SP3: a memory on a branch this story
never travelled is never sent to the AI. The drawer listed every memory
alike, so on a fork you read "Fell down the cellar stairs; badly hurt" and
reasonably concluded the model knew it. It does not. That is worse than
either hiding the row or retrieving it — it is the screen claiming
something the engine contradicts.
Hiding them is not the answer either; that was the original comment's
point, and it stands. A memory nobody can list is a memory nobody can
delete, in a phase whose rule is that nothing is removed automatically.
So the whole bank still lists, and the rows off the current path are set
back, dashed, and labelled "another branch". MemoryOut.on_path carries it,
computed from the predicate retrieval itself uses rather than a second
spelling of the same idea — two spellings drift, and the failure mode here
is a badge that says the opposite of what the model gets. Pinning does not
override it: the path clause runs before pinning is considered.
The relationship is asymmetric and there is now a test that says so. A fork
borrows its ancestors, so a memory written on the parent is on the fork's
path too; the reverse never is. Worth pinning before somebody makes it
symmetric on the grounds that it looks wrong.
399 tests, three new, egress ceilings intact — the flag costs one id-only
query. Verified in a browser on tools/branch_fixture.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015H5qiyiR7gtFQaoDphHZ3g
SP7 needs three branch operations and SP5 built one. Switching exists;
naming and deleting had no column and no route between them.
A name is stored because a player chose it. An unnamed branch keeps NULL
rather than a generated "branch 4" — a generated label is derived, and it
would go stale the moment a branch before it is deleted and the ordinals
shift underneath. The client draws those from the fork depth, which
nothing can shift. The v2 bundle carries the name for the same reason it
carries the fork points and leaves `lineage` out: it is a decision, not
something computed from one.
Delete is what stands between a tree and unbounded growth, since nothing
prunes one on its own. It refuses two branches: the root, which holds the
turns every other branch borrows, and the one being read — including any
branch the head was forked from, which is the same mistake in disguise and
the one that would cascade the head away and leave head_branch_id pointing
at nothing. The nodes, memories and descendants go through the foreign
keys that already cascade.
A cursor standing on a deleted branch is cleared. On Postgres a stale
branch id would simply never resolve; SQLite hands the freed id to the
next fork, and then the anchor resolves onto a branch it has never seen
and calls a stretch of story already summarized.
396 tests, 15 new.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015H5qiyiR7gtFQaoDphHZ3g
