Every read of an action now goes through a single module. `context/lineage.py`
turns a branch's stored lineage into the OR-of-ranges that is "this story", and
history, paging, the newest-action lookups, the index screen and the scripting
history API all select through it. A forgotten clause does not raise — it
quietly assembles a page, or a prompt, out of two different stories — so the
clause lives in one place rather than in a convention.
The read that mattered most was the shortcut: `_from_memory` sliced
`adventure.actions`, which is every branch's actions, not the path. It now cuts
the loaded collection down with the same predicate the SQL uses. Same trap one
layer up, and user-visible: `pipeline._history()` hands user scripts the story,
and was handing them the collection.
Tail reads window the lineage as well as the rows: the newest few entries cover
the context budget, so a story forked twenty times reads its tail with one
clause and costs 1.07x what an unforked story of the same length costs. The
estimate is depth arithmetic, and where a deleted action leaves a gap the read
notices it came up short and widens to the whole ancestry.
Ordering moves from `index` to `depth`, with `id` breaking ties. The two hold
the same numbers until retry stops mutating rows in SP4, but only one of them
is a position along a path.
One thing SP1 did not anticipate: wiring the writers was not enough. From here
a row without a branch is a row no read can see, and "every writer remembers"
has to hold for every fixture, script and test ever written — including the
SP0 baseline, which writes its actions straight to the database and must pass
unmodified. So the session enforces it: `tree.place_new_nodes` runs from
before_flush and places anything unplaced. The call sites keep their explicit
calls, because a node placed at the call site is placed before the code around
it reads it back.
316 tests green: the 297 from SP1, plus 19 in test_branch_clause.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
Phase 14 SP1. The tree goes into the schema and nothing reads it yet: a
`branches` table, `branch_id`/`depth` on actions and memories, a head pointer
on adventures, migrations 46-52, and a server-side backfill that re-reads every
existing adventure as a tree with one branch. `depth` holds the number `index`
already held, gaps included, so no story changes — a linear story *is* a tree
with one branch, which is what makes the SP0 baseline passing unmodified the
pass condition rather than a hope.
The writer had to come with it. No migration will ever visit a row written
after it ran, so columns backfilled today and populated next subphase would
leave a hole exactly the width of one deploy, and from SP2 on a row without a
branch is a row no read can see. `app/tree.py` owns that: one module, because a
node written without a branch fails by disappearing rather than by raising.
Three things the schema itself insisted on:
- `adventures.head_branch_id` is a plain integer, not a foreign key. Pointing
both ways makes the two tables a cycle create_all cannot order, and its
escape hatch needs an ALTER SQLite does not have. It is a cache, and a head
naming a branch that is gone recovers onto the root.
- `lineage` is NOT NULL, so the backfill inserts `'[]'` and fills it in a
second pass guarded on `json_array_length(lineage) = 0` — not `= '[]'`,
because Postgres `json` has no equality operator.
- SQLite will not drop a column a foreign key names, which is how two existing
tests broke: they simulated an old database by rewinding the stamp while
leaving the new columns in place. Every ADD COLUMN migration is now
idempotent, and `tests/test_tree_migration.py` builds a genuine schema 45 by
rebuilding three tables from frozen DDL so the real ALTERs run.
297 tests green, 14 of them new. `branches` costs 0.1 kB of a 733.5 kB turn;
page load and index are byte-identical to the recorded figures.
The deploy that ships this needs one `VACUUM FULL actions;` on the direct
endpoint afterwards — it rewrites every row.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
