59b5ebc2d85bdf53d38b6bcf347c496dd3432be1
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
59b5ebc2d8 |
v1.1 WP-C: browser release coverage
Drives in a real browser the reader workflows v1 proved only through the API or the component suite, including an export that leaves the browser as a file. Final run: 91 checks (the 38 existing M11 checks plus 53 new), 0 failed, 0 skipped, on the production build over trusted-LAN HTTPS. - tools/m11_browser.py: scenarios for Retry and takes, Save Point create / restore / Redo, state correction (accepted, and a refused correction with its reason), narration length reaching each turn's prompt, failed generation (an unserved model blocked up front; a listed model that cannot narrate failing in the open) and recovery, and export download from the library and from campaign settings, imported into a fresh application. Rows are tagged M11 / WP-C and counted separately; --only for development. The M11 checks now wait on conditions instead of sleeping. - tools/m11_webdriver.py: Firefox download preferences, a $HOME-only download folder, a download wait that ignores partial, empty, pre-existing and still-growing files, centred real clicks, tabs, and condition waits. - tests/test_v11_c_browser_helpers.py: the download wait, prefs and $HOME guard, without a browser. - frontend: a correction the story refused was presented as "Generation failed" with a Retry offer and a typed-input claim. It is now "That correction was not applied", not retryable, with the reason kept (errors.js, FailureNotice.jsx; 3 regression tests). - DEVELOPMENT.md: the harness command, download profile and $HOME rule, what counts as a finished download, and the no-sleep rule. - docs: V1.1-PLAN, VERSION v4.4, planning README, reports/v1.1/V1.1-WP-C-REPORT.md. Open for the owner: "Correct" on an Important Facts row is always refused (K1), and a partly refused correction is not reachable from the reader UI. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VvegagkhuCZoFPdv4M1egY |
||
|
JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
432f04100b |
M11 closeout: accept v1 release validation
The browser, offline and identity runs had last been taken on |
||
|
JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
ef25b0a876 |
Stop re-reading the whole prompt every turn, and let a lost run carry on
M01, the hundred-turn campaign, is the one REQUIRED test still outstanding. Everything here is about it finishing, and being worth believing when it does. No requirement changed, no acceptance test was retired or relaxed, and M11 §P.1's "no performance requirement" still stands: what changed is the cost of a turn, not what a turn contains. An inference server caches a prompt by its prefix. The history window gave up its oldest action every turn, which changed the prompt near the front and threw that cache away, so nearly the whole prompt was reprocessed every turn however little had actually changed. The window now snaps the oldest depth to a block and holds it, stepping every few turns. Measured on real builder output at an 8,192-token budget: 124.0s per turn against 362.4s. The cost is history depth, bounded by TRIM_FRACTION at a quarter of the window, which is the dial between recent history and speed. A run that dies no longer starts again from turn one. m11_long_run checkpoints resume.json after the prologue, after every scheduled step and after every turn, and --resume reattaches to the same campaign. A finished run deletes it, so the file's presence means an unfinished run and starting fresh over one is refused. The model timeout is an option rather than a hard-coded 600s, a turn that overruns is a failed turn instead of an unhandled exception that ends the run with no summary, and a run that has stopped producing turns writes its evidence and stops. Two checks could not fail. M04's planted clue went into an add_fact "detail" key that the event does not define, so it was dropped and fact_still_in_state could never be true; it is now in "value" and proved at turn one, which stops a run measuring nothing for hours. m11_browser degraded silently without a narrator into two failures that read exactly like a product regression, and now requires one, with --no-narrator as an explicit opt-out that marks the run partial. Window discovery speaks Ollama's native API, so against vLLM or llama.cpp's own server the window goes unverified and the budget uncapped -- M11's own failure mode reached by another route. context_window_override lets the operator state what they launched the server with, and is used only where discovery left a hole: a verified window always wins, so a declaration can lower an unknown ceiling into existence and never raise a known one. "verified" still means the server answered, so window_verified in a turn's provenance keeps the meaning M11's report counts on. planning/README.md said the M11 tree was staged rather than committed, in two places; it was committed and signed. Planning package v3.8. Backend 1,376 passed, 17 skipped, 0 failed; frontend 161; lint and build clean. Every M11 harness re-run on this tree: browser 38/0/0, offline 23/0, identity clean, contrast unchanged, recovery 14/0 on a small bundle. M01 itself has not been run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01E9LiyxBxnMTXV2wRjdyDGB |
||
|
JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
144406cd48 |
M11: what the server will actually read
The release-validation milestone, and the thing it had to settle first was whether any of the earlier evidence meant what it said. M8 measured a deployment enforcing a 4,096-token input window while the application budgeted 16,384. Every request returned 200. What Ollama does with the excess is drop the oldest tokens, and the oldest tokens here are the system block — the narrator's rules and the campaign canon. A hundred-turn certification against that server would have looked perfect and proved nothing, which is why this milestone could not begin with a hundred turns. So the application asks now. Ollama's window is a property of how a model was loaded rather than of the request — sending num_ctx is accepted, ignored, and worse, reloads the model at the server's own default — so the only honest move is to find out and then tell the truth about it. /api/ps reports what a resident model is being served with, /api/show what an unloaded one will load with, both on the same host inference already uses, through the same endpoint policy and the same TLS trust store. A verified window is a ceiling on the budget; an unverified one leaves the budget alone and is recorded as unverified in the turn's own provenance, so an old turn can be asked afterwards whether it was built against a checked window. There is no third behaviour, and in particular no hard-coded 4,096: a number the server did not say would be right on one machine and wrong on the next. The proof that this is doing something is a campaign whose canon sits at the front of the prompt, 120 turns of history, and a 4,096-token window. The canon is still there afterwards and the oldest history is gone. The same campaign built the old way produces a prompt more than twice the window — the defect, reproduced, so the fix is measured against it rather than asserted. Two defects the validation found on its own, and they are the same defect twice: something was true and nobody was told. A manual state correction of four changes with one bad reference applied three, returned 201, and said nothing — while recording the refusal on the audit row nobody reads. It came to light because the identity diagnostic's own fixture was refused that way and the whole run proceeded on a campaign with no scene, which would have read as a model failure. And the narration-length setting moved no number: brief, medium and long each became one English sentence, while the numeric hint the model actually reads was derived from the global reply cap and said the same thing for all three. Both now say what they did. The other two post-M8 findings are closed as well. The tab said AI D&D, which no document had ever claimed it did not; it says Interactive Story now, with the open campaign first, and the name is the owner's decision rather than a find-and-replace to something narrower than the engine. After an Undo the reader could not tell where they had landed; the control row now ends with "Moment 11 · later story ahead", from the server's own answer, in the word the transcript already uses, with none of head, branch or depth anywhere near it. The identity diagnostic exists and the root cause does not. That campaign was destroyed, so no cause can be established — what M11 owes the finding is something that can classify the next occurrence, and a diagnostic that makes only the judgements a program can honestly make: duplicate keys, shared names, protagonist drift, state and context disagreeing. Whether prose misattributed a line is left to a person reading it beside its prompt, because a regex cannot read dialogue and one that pretended to would produce exactly the confident wrong answer this finding is about. Its detectors are proved to fire against a planted second Alice. Two entities may still share a display name. That was checked first, as the finding asked, and left permitted: a mother and a daughter, or a stranger giving a false name, are ordinary fiction, and refusing them to guard against a model mistake would refuse the wrong thing. What was missing was that it happened silently. It is reported now. Evidence, not inference: a hundred accepted turns against a real narrator with genuine process restarts; a real browser against the built SPA; a container with no network at all; a campaign moved into a data directory that never existed. Each was discarded and re-run whenever the product changed under it, and the runs that were thrown away are listed in the report with the reason, along with ten defects in the harnesses themselves — because a harness that has only ever agreed with itself is not evidence, and two of M8's five harness defects were masking real ones. No dependency was added, removed or upgraded. No acceptance test was retired, relaxed or reclassified. M11 is implemented and verified; it is not accepted, and there is no release tag. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qyn3oRd4D6pi72nKBG725B |