Every attempt at a turn is now its own row at the same (branch, depth),
with `live` naming the one the story tells. The JSON repeating group on
`actions.variants` is read one last time, by a migration that writes it
out as the sibling rows it always described, and then goes unread.
The snapshots turn around with it: an action carries the state it left
behind rather than the state it started from, because attempts at one
turn share a starting position and differ exactly in their outcome.
Rolling back is "what the node in front left behind", one lookup on the
path, and it is what undo and retry now both read.
And the memory holdback goes. It existed because retry rewrote a row
under a mark that had already moved past it; a retry writes a sibling
now, and replacing what a coordinate says withdraws what was derived
from it — the same repair undo and delete already made.
The assembled prompt is still stored once per turn: it moves with the
live flag, so a superseded attempt keeps only the few hundred bytes that
were its own. Measured on the 600-action fixture: 700 rows for the same
600-turn story, prompt archive byte-identical at 0.50 MB, index 1.8 kB
and page load 62.7 kB unmoved.
347 tests green. `tests/test_story_tree_baseline.py` and
`tests/test_retry_variants.py` pass unmodified — SP4 was allowed to move
the baseline for the variant-count semantics and did not need to.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
The memory bank and the story summary each kept a cursor: how many story
actions they had already covered. A count is a position in a list, and this
list moves — delete an action in front of the mark and every later one slides
down a slot, so the mark now covers one it has never read. All the cursor
bookkeeping existed to patch that up.
Both marks are now (branch_id, depth): the node up to and including which the
work is done. A depth is a coordinate along a path, not an offset into a list,
so nothing in front of it can move it. That deletes rather than rewrites
`position_of_index`, `note_action_removed`, `_rewind_cursors_to_index`,
`prune_dangling_memories` and the every-pass clamp in `run_post_turn`.
A memory hangs off the node its block ends on, so a fork inherits its
ancestors' memories without copying any, and retrieval selects through the
branch clause over the *whole* lineage — recall is long-range by definition and
cannot be windowed. Measured: 1,807 B on a story forked twenty times against
1,823 B on a flat one of the same length.
Migrations 53-56 translate the old counts into nodes. They rewrite `adventures`
and not `actions`, so this one needs no VACUUM FULL.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
Every read of an action now goes through a single module. `context/lineage.py`
turns a branch's stored lineage into the OR-of-ranges that is "this story", and
history, paging, the newest-action lookups, the index screen and the scripting
history API all select through it. A forgotten clause does not raise — it
quietly assembles a page, or a prompt, out of two different stories — so the
clause lives in one place rather than in a convention.
The read that mattered most was the shortcut: `_from_memory` sliced
`adventure.actions`, which is every branch's actions, not the path. It now cuts
the loaded collection down with the same predicate the SQL uses. Same trap one
layer up, and user-visible: `pipeline._history()` hands user scripts the story,
and was handing them the collection.
Tail reads window the lineage as well as the rows: the newest few entries cover
the context budget, so a story forked twenty times reads its tail with one
clause and costs 1.07x what an unforked story of the same length costs. The
estimate is depth arithmetic, and where a deleted action leaves a gap the read
notices it came up short and widens to the whole ancestry.
Ordering moves from `index` to `depth`, with `id` breaking ties. The two hold
the same numbers until retry stops mutating rows in SP4, but only one of them
is a position along a path.
One thing SP1 did not anticipate: wiring the writers was not enough. From here
a row without a branch is a row no read can see, and "every writer remembers"
has to hold for every fixture, script and test ever written — including the
SP0 baseline, which writes its actions straight to the database and must pass
unmodified. So the session enforces it: `tree.place_new_nodes` runs from
before_flush and places anything unplaced. The call sites keep their explicit
calls, because a node placed at the call site is placed before the code around
it reads it back.
316 tests green: the 297 from SP1, plus 19 in test_branch_clause.py.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
