* Rewrite comments in Google developer documentation style
Rewrite the comments and docstrings across the backend core modules so they
read plainly. The previous prose was accurate but dense and figurative, which
made it slow to skim.
Applies the Google developer documentation style guide: short sentences, active
voice, present tense, American spelling, and no metaphors, idioms, or
rhetorical asides. Replaces em-dash chains with separate sentences.
SP7 needs three branch operations and SP5 built one. Switching exists;
naming and deleting had no column and no route between them.
A name is stored because a player chose it. An unnamed branch keeps NULL
rather than a generated "branch 4" — a generated label is derived, and it
would go stale the moment a branch before it is deleted and the ordinals
shift underneath. The client draws those from the fork depth, which
nothing can shift. The v2 bundle carries the name for the same reason it
carries the fork points and leaves `lineage` out: it is a decision, not
something computed from one.
Delete is what stands between a tree and unbounded growth, since nothing
prunes one on its own. It refuses two branches: the root, which holds the
turns every other branch borrows, and the one being read — including any
branch the head was forked from, which is the same mistake in disguise and
the one that would cascade the head away and leave head_branch_id pointing
at nothing. The nodes, memories and descendants go through the foreign
keys that already cascade.
A cursor standing on a deleted branch is cleared. On Postgres a stale
branch id would simply never resolve; SQLite hands the freed id to the
next fork, and then the anchor resolves onto a branch it has never seen
and calls a stretch of story already summarized.
396 tests, 15 new.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015H5qiyiR7gtFQaoDphHZ3g
A bundle had one list and a forked adventure has two stories, so export was
emitting every branch's turns interleaved by index — a mangled story rather
than lost data, and unreachable only because forking has no UI yet.
`ai-dnd-adventure-v2` carries the branches, the depth each one left its
parent at, which attempt at every turn is the story, and what each node
left behind. That last one is not decoration: the after-snapshots are what
a branch switch puts back, and a bundle without them imports a tree nobody
can switch inside.
`app/bundle.py` owns both formats and nothing else knows either. The v1
reader stays — those files are already on people's disks — and it is now
the only place a `variants` array exists anywhere.
The rule the module is built on is that a bundle carries what was chosen
and never what is derived. The head branch, the fork points, the live flags
and the anchors are decisions somebody made. The lineage, the head depth,
the legacy `index` and the variant ordinals are computed from those and are
rebuilt on the way in, because a bundle is a text file anybody can edit and
a derived field shipped beside its source is a chance for the file to
disagree with itself where no read would report it.
`index` is the one that stops being academic here. It agreed with `depth`
until SP5, and this is the first writer that has to fill it for a forked
story, where two branches both hold a node at depth 4. It is allocated one
per turn instead: siblings share it, no two coordinates do.
Everything a hand-edited file can get wrong about the shape of a tree is a
400 raised before the adventure row exists, because a half-applied import
is exactly the failure this phase exists to end — a story that goes quiet.
A file wrong about which attempt is live is corrected rather than refused;
that is an invariant of the database, not of the format.
Measured on the 600-action fixture: 587 kB to 911 kB, and all of the
increase is the outcomes at 489 B a node — the coordinates themselves save
57.5 B a node against the old turn-and-variants shape. Twenty forks add
660 B. 4.3% of the import body cap.
381 tests green, 16 of them new in test_bundle_v2.py. No migration, no
vacuum owed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015H5qiyiR7gtFQaoDphHZ3g
The memory bank and the story summary each kept a cursor: how many story
actions they had already covered. A count is a position in a list, and this
list moves — delete an action in front of the mark and every later one slides
down a slot, so the mark now covers one it has never read. All the cursor
bookkeeping existed to patch that up.
Both marks are now (branch_id, depth): the node up to and including which the
work is done. A depth is a coordinate along a path, not an offset into a list,
so nothing in front of it can move it. That deletes rather than rewrites
`position_of_index`, `note_action_removed`, `_rewind_cursors_to_index`,
`prune_dangling_memories` and the every-pass clamp in `run_post_turn`.
A memory hangs off the node its block ends on, so a fork inherits its
ancestors' memories without copying any, and retrieval selects through the
branch clause over the *whole* lineage — recall is long-range by definition and
cannot be windowed. Measured: 1,807 B on a story forked twenty times against
1,823 B on a flat one of the same length.
Migrations 53-56 translate the old counts into nodes. They rewrite `adventures`
and not `actions`, so this one needs no VACUUM FULL.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
Parth