parththakkar106andClaude Opus 5
4af6e17406
Nine findings from a review of the phase-14 stack. The one about a retry withdrawing a memory is not a bug — a memory anchored to a node describes that node, and it goes when the node goes. The root is the exception, and it is the only one: migration 62 parked every memory written before memories had coordinates on depth 0, so withdrawing the opening node would retire a whole bank nobody attached there. A memory with no source range covers no story and now stays; a summary that genuinely ends there is still withdrawn. The rest are repairs. * The adventure list quoted whichever attempt was written last rather than the one the story tells, so switching back left the index disagreeing with the page. * A v1 import gave a typed memory no depth, rebuilding the NULL the migration exists to remove — invisible until the imported adventure forked. * The action cap counted a v1 file's turns, and a turn expands into a row per saved attempt, so a file inside the cap could write a multiple of it. * Forking a live node on a borrowed ancestor promoted a sibling on a branch the caller never named. It is a branch switch, and now says so. * Switching attempts left the state, status and memory panels reading the previous take: the story does not change length, so nothing keyed on its length noticed. Same class as the branch-switch bug this phase already fixed. * A retry after switching back numbered the new attempt into the middle of the group instead of the end. * The cursor backfill numbered every action in the table once per adventure; correlated to the adventure being updated, it is an index lookup instead. * Renaming a branch answered own_actions=0. And one behaviour change recorded rather than repaired: script-visible history and actionCount no longer count blank-text rows. That is the right shape and there is no reading compatible with both, so plan/14 says so. 409 tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015H5qiyiR7gtFQaoDphHZ3g
React + Vite
This template provides a minimal setup to get React working in Vite with HMR and some Oxlint rules.
Currently, two official plugins are available:
- @vitejs/plugin-react uses Oxc
- @vitejs/plugin-react-swc uses SWC
React Compiler
The React Compiler is not enabled on this template because of its impact on dev & build performances. To add it, see this documentation.
Expanding the Oxlint configuration
If you are developing a production application, we recommend using TypeScript with type-aware lint rules enabled. Check out the TS template for information on how to integrate TypeScript and Oxlint's TypeScript related rules in your project.