Driving SP9 by hand found both, and neither was reachable from a test that
did not exist yet.
**The pager arrived one page load late.** A retry's reply *is* the second take
of its turn, so it comes back needing a pager -- but the SSE stream builds its
own ActionOut and so never got the annotation. The numbers only appeared once
the page was reloaded, which is the one moment nobody reloads. That is the
third place this codebase builds an action payload a different way; the other
two were patched when `take_count` was added, and this one was missed because
nothing read it from the wire.
**"> You > You follow the pulse down the corridor."** The editor is seeded from
the stored text, which is already the formatted form -- the same text plain
edit puts in the box and writes back verbatim. Running it through the formatter
again doubles the prefix, so `run_player_turn` learns `preformatted`.
And the question the driving raised: does the shared state follow the branch?
`test_take_state.py` answers it with a script that adds ten gold a turn, which
is the clearest possible witness -- a take that stacks instead of replacing
says so in one digit. Three of its five fail with `roll_back_before` removed;
the other two pass either way on purpose, one being the premise and one going
through `stand_on`, which has restored state since SP5.
Confirmed against the running app too, on the HP-script demo: a path crossing
three branches carried exactly the damage of the nine AI nodes on it, and none
of the 66 points sitting on takes those branches never told.
433 tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
