Eviction ranked on use_count first. A memory written this turn has never
been used, so once every survivor in a full bank had been retrieved even
once, the newborn was the lowest row in the bank and was marked forgotten
by the same post-turn run that wrote it — one pass after the one that
embedded it, before retrieval ever saw it.
That state never ends, because counts only go up. The bank an adventure
happened to hold when it first filled is the bank it keeps for good, and
everything the story does afterwards is summarized, evicted and never
ranked. A test now plays four turns against a full bank and asserts the
survivors are the new memories, not the opening ones; before this it kept
the opening three and forgot all four.
Order on last-touch instead, with the count as the tiebreak. A new memory
carries the newest timestamp there is, so it is the safest row in the bank
rather than the most doomed, and it has until something outlives it to
prove itself — the "protect the newest" behaviour falls out of the
ordering rather than being a count of rows to spare. Little is given up:
a memory that is genuinely used stays recently-used by being retrieved,
so the two orders only disagree about memories that mattered once and
have not been wanted since.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017Dvvqn9ZDR4ixeFPHNbww7
