Say who the game is waiting on, and move the Fedora; replay in words

Three items folded into the unshipped v0.7.9.

WAITING ON (reported by Jesse from play). The status line said "nobody —
the Division is running itself" while the game was stopped on the
Superintendent. Frame.actor carried clock.currentActor, which is null
for the whole Mainline Phase, so all three interruptions — §8.1's
clearance ruling, Gitea#5's Yard Office offer, Gitea#19's Red Flag
prompt — reported that nobody was holding it up. actingPlayer had the
answer since the Gitea#5 refactor; the Frame threw it away. It carries
actingPlayer now, plus a new `awaiting` field naming the question and
the train: "waiting on Bob · a clearance ruling · Train 4". Naming the
person alone is not enough when three different things can be pending.

THE FEDORA (TODO #29) rides at the right-hand end of the phase row
instead of a line of its own, and wraps under rather than squeezing the
chips.

THE DEVELOPER REPLAY (TODO #34) printed "loss — revenueFloor", the same
defect Gitea#16 was filed about, still alive because nothing
player-facing pointed at it. panels.ts's reasonSentence is exported and
shared rather than reimplemented, fed the last recorded frame and
stripped of markup. The drift test maps win/loss to won/lost so it still
checks the two AGREE rather than that they are spelled alike.

Also carries the previous, unsigned commit's work: the two setup screens
worded the same section by section.

877 tests pass, ten new.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AdG46Ja2PEDBkpqiDazMoX

test/replay.test.ts

@@ -214,6 +214,24 @@ describe('a blocked platform says why (Gitea#2)', () => {
     assert.ok(f.inboundBox.length === 0, 'the red slots were free — the shortage is the only cause');
   });
 
+  it('says why the game ended in words, not as a raw enum (TODO #34)', () => {
+    /**
+     * The heading read `loss — revenueFloor` — the exact defect Gitea#16 was filed about on the
+     * playable page, still alive here a release after that was fixed, because nothing
+     * player-facing pointed at the developer replay. It shares `reasonSentence` with the results
+     * screen now, so the two cannot explain one ending in two ways.
+     */
+    const rec = record(1234, 'standard');
+    for (const raw of ['revenueFloor', 'daysElapsed', 'collisionFloor']) {
+      assert.ok(!rec.outcome.includes(raw), `the summary still prints the raw reason "${raw}"`);
+    }
+    assert.doesNotMatch(rec.outcome, /<[^>]+>/, 'markup leaked into a heading and a console line');
+    assert.match(rec.outcome, /Revenue/, 'the summary says nothing about how the game went');
+    // And the sentence is the shared one, with this game's own numbers in it.
+    assert.match(rec.outcome, /closed short|last on the timetable|declared unsafe/,
+      'the ending is not explained in the words the results screen uses');
+  });
+
   it('says nothing about a platform that is working fine', () => {
     // Passengers waiting AND a train with an empty coach to take them: no impediment.
     const s = createGame({ id: 'g', seed: 5, config, playerNames: ['p'] });
@@ -257,7 +275,10 @@ describe('replay recording', () => {
     const last = rec.frames[rec.frames.length - 1]!;
     assert.equal(last.revenue, stats.revenue.net, 'final revenue disagrees with the engine');
     assert.equal(last.day, s.clock.day, 'final Day disagrees with the engine');
-    assert.match(rec.outcome, new RegExp(stats.result));
+    // The summary says "won"/"lost" rather than the engine's `win`/`loss` (TODO #34 — it is a
+    // sentence for a reader now, not an enum). Mapped here so this still checks the two AGREE,
+    // which is what the test is for, rather than checking they are spelled the same.
+    assert.match(rec.outcome, new RegExp(stats.result === 'win' ? 'won' : 'lost'));
   });
 
   it('narrates every frame', () => {