v0.7.9 — solitaire setup screen feedback, and the dead settings it exposed

Four pieces of feedback from Jesse on the solitaire setup screen.

THE COLLISION LIMITS DID NOTHING IN SOLITAIRE. Asked to reword those
entries to "the game ends immediately and results in a loss", which was
unwriteable: advance.ts gated the §3.4 check on competitive/coop, and a
solitaire game's mode is 'solitaire'. Both limits were offered as live
settings, rode into the config, and never fired — the existing text was
already false. The exclusion was never a stated rule and nothing
recorded a reason for it. Jesse's ruling: the settings do what they say,
so the gate is gone rather than the controls.

Measured, not asserted — 200 standard developer-bot games:
loss/collisionFloor 1 in 200, Days played 5.00 -> 4.98 mean with a
minimum of 1, collisions per game unchanged at 0.14. Recorded in
TODO.md under Play Balance, since full-length figures predate it.

Extra start defaults to ownOffice: at one seat it is the same rule as
anyOffice (apply.ts only rejects another seat's start), so this is a
label fix with no gameplay effect.

Also: collision wording on all three screens, Employee Rotation reads
"not applicable for solitaire", and the save warning is legible at 14px
on an amber panel with buttons that say Continue Existing Saved Game and
Deal New Game.

869 tests pass, two new; one asserted the opposite of the ruling and
says so where it was reversed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AdG46Ja2PEDBkpqiDazMoX

test/advance.test.ts

@@ -655,13 +655,36 @@ describe('victory conditions (§3, Gap 10e) — unified 2026-08-20', () => {
     assert.notEqual(s.status, 'finished');
   });
 
-  it('solitaire never checks the collision floor, whatever the counts', () => {
+  it('solitaire checks the collision floor too, like every other mode', () => {
+    /**
+     * REVERSED 2026-08-30, and this test previously asserted the opposite ("solitaire never checks
+     * the collision floor, whatever the counts").
+     *
+     * The exclusion was never a stated rule — §3.4 does not carve solitaire out — and nothing on
+     * screen reflected it: `SOLO_CONFIG` carried both limits, the New Game dialog offered them as
+     * live settings, and the text beside them said the game would end in a loss. A solitaire player
+     * could set a limit of 1 and crash all game. Found reviewing that screen's wording; Jesse's
+     * ruling is that the settings do what they say.
+     */
     const s = game(1, { mode: 'solitaire', maxCollisionsPerDay: 1, maxCollisionsTotal: 1 });
     s.collisionsToday = 99;
     s.collisionsTotal = 99;
     s.clock.stage = 1;
     s.clock.phase = 'shiftChange';
     advance(s);
+    assert.equal(s.status, 'finished');
+    assert.equal(s.outcome!.reason, 'collisionFloor');
+  });
+
+  it('still lets a solitaire game switch the collision floor off with 0', () => {
+    // The disable path is what a player who does not want the new ending reaches for, so it has to
+    // work at one seat exactly as it does at four.
+    const s = game(1, { mode: 'solitaire', maxCollisionsPerDay: 0, maxCollisionsTotal: 0 });
+    s.collisionsToday = 99;
+    s.collisionsTotal = 99;
+    s.clock.stage = 1;
+    s.clock.phase = 'shiftChange';
+    advance(s);
     assert.notEqual(s.status, 'finished');
   });
 });