Files
JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5 62a997f364 M4: close out Save Points, with browser verification
Closes M4. The review's three findings are fixed, the durability rule the
specification always implied is now enforced, and M3's and M4's browser
behaviour has been verified in a real browser for the first time.

B-1 -- the Save Point list was an N+1 that loaded whole Action rows,
narration included, to answer "does a row exist here". It is now one bulk
two-column coordinate query plus one lineage: 53 SELECTs for 25 Save Points
became 5, and the count no longer grows with the list. The clause is an OR
of exact (branch, depth) pairs rather than two IN lists, because the cross
product would report a Save Point resolved on the strength of another one's
depth existing on this one's branch. A test builds exactly that trap.

B-2 -- reclassified during closeout from "missing warning" to a behaviour
defect, and fixed as one. STORY-BRANCH-SEMANTICS §19 says a named checkpoint
remains until explicitly deleted, and §28 already required future cleanup to
retain checkpoint-referenced paths; a cascade that silently removed Save
Points with a branch violated both, and a warning would only have documented
the violation. A branch a Save Point names can no longer be deleted. The
request is refused with the offending Save Points named, the user deletes
them explicitly -- which deletes no story -- and the branch then goes. The
scope is the subtree, because deleting a branch takes its descendants. Both
delete controls disable and explain. Recorded as a new §19.1; models.py,
TECHNICAL-DESIGN §8.8 and DATA-MODEL §8 had all recorded the cascade as the
rule and now record the refusal.

An earlier pass in this same closeout had kept the cascade and added a
warning. That was the wrong fix and its tests were replaced rather than left
standing, since they pinned the defect.

B-3 -- the D11/L03 automation never left one process, so it could not
distinguish durable state from a live Python object. It now spawns real
server processes, kills the first, and reads the campaign back with the
second.

C-5 -- creating a Save Point takes the campaign's turn lock. "Save where I
am" has to name one committed position, and the head is what a turn in
flight is about to move. Rename and Delete deliberately do not take it.

The architecture is untouched: a Save Point is still name + note +
(branch, depth), and restore is still coordinate -> head.move_to_node ->
head.move_to -> attempts.restore_state. No second restore path, no state
copied into a checkpoint, no fork on restore.

Browser verification -- the first in this project, and it covers both
milestones. Firefox 154.0.1 through geckodriver over the W3C WebDriver
protocol, driving the rendered DOM: 47/47 checks, twice, on independent
databases, no console errors. M3's Undo/Redo enable states, transcript
movement, Retry and the take pager, divergence retiring Redo; M4's whole
Save Point lifecycle, both confirmations, and the new branch-delete refusal
including its recovery. No dependency was added: the WebDriver client is
stdlib HTTP.

No application defect was found by the browser. Four failures occurred, all
in the harness -- a wrong SPA route, a wait comparing transcript length when
the empty-story placeholder is longer than the first turn, a fixture
deleting the branch it was reading, and a reload assertion that sampled
once instead of waiting. The last was checked against the app before being
called a harness bug.

Tests: 698 backend pass (was 680), 60 M4, 94 M3 history, 66 export/
migrations, 93 security/local-only. Frontend lint and build clean, Docker
build clean, loopback binding unchanged. No assertion weakened, no skip
added.

Planning: STORY-BRANCH-SEMANTICS §19.1 is the only behavioural change and it
strengthens §19. V1-ACCEPTANCE-TESTS records D11-D14, I04, L03 and the
E-series, keeping automated, live-runtime and browser evidence distinct, and
weakens no pass condition. DATA-MODEL records the coordinate with the retry
measurement that settles it. BROWSER-UX-SPEC rules for Moment over Turn.
BUILD-MILESTONES marks M4 COMPLETE, closes M3's browser condition, and lists
what M5 inherits. VERSION adds v2.6.

No new ADR: ADR 005 already decides that history is preserved rather than
overwritten, and §19.1 is that decision applied to checkpoint-referenced
history.

M4 is closed. M5 may now be briefed; it has not been started.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PWU4gTfLYY6Qq9U7aa9Qw2
2026-09-04 06:34:56 -04:00

865 lines
25 KiB
Markdown

# Adventure Storyteller — Data Model
**Status:** v1.0 conceptual model aligned to Phase 0B decisions
**Purpose:** Define the persistent information the application must represent, independent of the final fork or database implementation.
## 1. Design Goals
The data model must support persistent interactive stories, complete authoritative history, non-destructive branching, checkpoints and rollback, genre-independent narrative state, long-term memory, imported local knowledge, prompt/context provenance, future image/video/audio/TTS/STT generation, export/restore, and local-only operation.
The same core schema should work for fantasy, science fiction, mystery, horror, historical fiction, westerns, and other narrative genres.
## 2. Core Principles
### 2.1 Application-owned authority
The database is the source of truth. The model may propose narration and state changes, but those proposals become authoritative only after application validation.
### 2.2 Non-destructive history
Accepted turns are historical records. Going backward should move the active story head or create a branch, not silently delete accepted history.
### 2.3 Historical reconstruction
The system must answer both:
- What is true now?
- What was true at a particular earlier turn on a particular branch?
### 2.4 Genre neutrality
Avoid fantasy- or science-fiction-specific core fields. Use generic concepts such as characters, locations, organizations, items, vehicles, facts, relationships, conditions, scenes, and story threads.
## 3. Conceptual Entity Map
```text
Campaign
├── Branches
│ └── Turns
│ ├── Prompt Snapshot
│ ├── State Version
│ ├── Scene Snapshot
│ └── Retrieval Records
├── Checkpoints
├── Narrative Entities
├── Facts
├── Relationships
├── Story Threads
├── Memories
├── Summaries
├── Knowledge Sources
│ └── Knowledge Chunks
└── Media
├── Media Jobs
└── Media Assets
```
The exact SQL schema may differ from this conceptual model.
## 4. Campaign
A campaign is the top-level story container.
```yaml
campaign:
id: uuid
title: string
created_at: timestamp
updated_at: timestamp
active_branch_id: uuid
active_head_turn_id: optional uuid
status: active | archived
story_profile:
genre: string
subgenre: optional string
tone: optional string
style: optional string
point_of_view: optional string
tense: optional string
```
The active head is **stored on the campaign, not derived** from its newest turn.
This is the concept M3 implemented; the current implementation carries it as a
branch reference plus a depth on that branch rather than as a turn id, which is
an equivalent coordinate and is what the export format records. What matters
conceptually is that the position is a decision the campaign remembers: two
campaigns holding identical turns can be being read at different places, and
nothing about the turns themselves can tell them apart.
Campaigns also store durable narrator rules and model configuration.
Potential model roles:
- narrator,
- state extractor,
- summarizer,
- embedding model.
For v1, all model roles should use local Ollama-compatible models.
## 5. Branch
A branch represents one valid continuation of story history.
```yaml
branch:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
name: string
created_at: timestamp
created_from_branch_id: optional uuid
fork_turn_id: optional uuid
tip_turn_id: optional uuid
disposition: active | retained | disposable
status: active | archived
```
Rules:
- branches may share ancestral turns,
- shared history should not be duplicated unnecessarily,
- creating a branch must not modify the source branch,
- the campaign active head may sit behind the retained branch tip after Undo,
- Redo moves the active head forward while the prior continuation remains selected,
- a new write below the retained tip creates a new continuation and leaves the old future retained/disposable.
`disposition` above is conceptual. As implemented in M3 it is stored as **the
fact that produced it** rather than as a word: a branch records the depth a
divergent write left it at, and when. No value means active; a value means the
story past that depth is retained history no active head is reading. The
shallowest departure wins if a branch is left more than once.
Two properties of that representation are deliberate and worth carrying in this
document:
- **Nothing reads it to decide behavior.** Whether Redo is available, what the
transcript shows, and which continuation a write belongs to are all decided by
the lineage. A stale or hand-edited disposition therefore cannot make the story
wrong; it can only mislead a cleanup or recovery feature about what is
abandoned.
- **It survives export and import.** Every row of an abandoned line is exported
either way, so the disposition is the only thing distinguishing it from an
active one in a restored campaign.
Detailed behavior will be defined separately in `STORY-BRANCH-SEMANTICS.md`;
the architecture is recorded in ADR 012.
## 6. Turn
A turn is one accepted story interaction:
```text
user input -> narrator response -> accepted state transition
```
```yaml
turn:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
branch_id: uuid
parent_turn_id: optional uuid
created_at: timestamp
input:
mode: action | dialogue | direction | continue
text: string
output:
narration: string
generation:
provider: ollama
model: string
generation_settings: object
prompt_snapshot_id: uuid
state_before_id: uuid
state_after_id: uuid
scene_snapshot_id: optional uuid
status: pending | accepted | failed | superseded
```
The root turn has no parent.
An accepted historical turn should not silently disappear if another continuation is chosen.
## 7. Alternate Take
The system may need to distinguish:
- a different narrator response to the same user action,
- a genuinely different story branch.
Conceptual form:
```yaml
take:
id: uuid
turn_request_id: uuid
output_text: string
model_metadata: object
selected: boolean
```
Physical representation remains implementation-specific. The selected AI-DnD base already models alternate takes within its lineage machinery; production should retain that approach if it satisfies the required Retry/select/retention semantics without forcing a separate table.
## 8. Checkpoint
```yaml
checkpoint:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
turn_id: uuid
name: string
notes: optional string
created_at: timestamp
```
A checkpoint is a named pointer to a recoverable story position. It should normally remain tied to the turn where it was created. Restoring it moves the campaign active head; it does not delete later retained history. A new branch is created on the first divergent write after restore, not merely because the checkpoint was opened.
As implemented in M4, the pointer is a **coordinate rather than a turn id**:
`(branch_id, depth)`, which is the same pair §4 records as the campaign's active
head and which `head.node_at` resolves. This is the equivalence §4 already draws
between a turn reference and a branch-plus-depth, applied to the same position
from the other end, and it is not a shortcut — it is the more correct pointer of
the two for this data model:
- **A coordinate follows a retry; a row id does not.** One coordinate holds
every attempt at a turn and exactly one of them is live (§7). A Save Point
names the turn, so it must land on whichever take the story currently tells.
Pinning the row would leave the pointer on a superseded attempt the reader
cannot see.
- **The user-facing term is Save Point**; `checkpoint` remains the internal name
(`BROWSER-UX-SPEC.md` §23).
The row carries the name, an optional note, the coordinate, and its timestamps.
It carries **no** copy of the transcript, the state, the prompt, a memory, a
summary, or a branch's contents. Everything a restore produces comes from the
retained history the coordinate points into.
The retry case is what settles the coordinate-versus-turn-id question, and M4
closeout measured it rather than arguing it. A Save Point named a turn whose
live row was id 17; retrying that turn made id 17 dead and id 18 live at the
same coordinate; the Save Point resolved to id 18 and restored correctly. A row
id would have pinned a take the story no longer tells. **A Save Point names a
story position, not a particular take of it.**
Three further properties of the implemented model, recorded so they are decided
rather than incidental:
- **Names are not unique**, and nothing requires them to be. No product
requirement asks for uniqueness, and two names for one moment is a reasonable
thing for a player to want.
- **Several Save Points may name the same position.** Same reason.
- **Ordinary list presentation is newest-created first.** Story order is not
something the list can honestly claim: depths on lines that have parted
company are not comparable, so ordering by depth would draw a sequence that no
reading of the story passes through. When each was made is a fact about all of
them.
None of this is genre-specific. A coordinate is a position in a story; what the
state at that position *contains* is M5's question, and changing it does not
change what a Save Point is.
Two consequences worth recording here:
- **Restore reuses the campaign's one head-movement mechanism.** It resolves the
coordinate and moves the head; nothing is reconstructed and nothing is
deleted. The branch half of the head moves only when the coordinate is not on
the path being read, which is what makes a Save Point on a departed line
restorable at all — and what keeps a Save Point in a shared prefix from
dragging the reader off the line they chose. See `TECHNICAL-DESIGN.md` §8.8.
- **A checkpoint is durable against everything but its own explicit deletion.**
No pass removes one for going stale, sitting behind the head, or naming a line
the story left (`STORY-BRANCH-SEMANTICS.md` §19). Deleting a *branch* does not
remove one either: the deletion is refused while a checkpoint names any
position in the subtree, and the user deletes the checkpoint first
(§19.1). Deleting the whole campaign removes them, which is what deleting a
campaign means.
## 9. Narrative Entity
An entity is a persistent thing or concept in the fictional world.
```yaml
entity:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
type: string
name: string
aliases: [string]
description: string
status: active | inactive | destroyed | dead | unknown
created_turn_id: optional uuid
metadata: object
```
Recommended built-in categories:
- character,
- location,
- organization,
- item,
- vehicle,
- creature,
- structure,
- concept,
- other.
These are descriptive categories, not separate game systems.
## 10. Character
```yaml
character:
entity_id: uuid
role: optional string
description: string
current_location_id: optional uuid
condition: [string]
personality_notes: [string]
goals: [string]
secrets: [string]
```
Optional visual continuity fields:
```yaml
visual_profile:
apparent_age: optional string
build: optional string
hair: optional string
eyes: optional string
clothing: optional string
distinctive_features: [string]
continuity_notes: [string]
```
## 11. Location
```yaml
location:
entity_id: uuid
description: string
parent_location_id: optional uuid
current_status: optional string
visual_profile:
architecture: optional string
environment: optional string
lighting: optional string
signature_features: [string]
continuity_notes: [string]
```
## 12. Organization
Organizations may represent factions, governments, companies, guilds, military units, religious organizations, or informal groups.
```yaml
organization:
entity_id: uuid
purpose: optional string
current_status: optional string
```
Specific characteristics should usually live in facts and relationships.
## 13. Items and Vehicles
Items and vehicles remain generic entities.
Examples:
- silver key,
- longsword,
- encrypted data crystal,
- survey ship,
- horse-drawn carriage.
Possession and location should normally be represented as relationships or facts:
```text
Aldric --possesses--> Silver Key
Persephone --docked_at--> Ceres Station
```
## 14. Fact
Facts represent assertions about the story world.
```yaml
fact:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
subject_entity_id: optional uuid
predicate: string
object_entity_id: optional uuid
value: optional scalar_or_object
authority: string
source_type: string
source_id: optional uuid
created_turn_id: optional uuid
invalidated_turn_id: optional uuid
status: active | superseded | disputed
```
Examples:
- Mara knows Aldric has the silver key.
- The Persephone cannot travel faster than light.
- Edrin disappeared three weeks before the campaign began.
- The eastern bridge collapsed during Turn 47.
Minimum authority categories:
- campaign_canon,
- accepted_story,
- current_state,
- imported_canon,
- reference,
- heuristic,
- inspiration.
Exact context behavior will be defined in `CONTEXT-AND-MEMORY.md`.
## 15. Relationship
```yaml
relationship:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
source_entity_id: uuid
target_entity_id: uuid
type: string
status: string
description: optional string
created_turn_id: optional uuid
ended_turn_id: optional uuid
```
Examples:
- Aldric -> trusts -> Mara
- Mara -> member_of -> Circle of Ash
- Silver Key -> belongs_to -> Aldric
- Persephone -> docked_at -> Ceres Station
Relationship types should remain extensible.
## 16. Story Thread
Story threads track unresolved or resolved narrative business.
```yaml
story_thread:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
title: string
description: string
status: open | dormant | resolved | abandoned
importance: optional number_or_label
opened_turn_id: optional uuid
resolved_turn_id: optional uuid
```
These are narrative continuity tools, not RPG quests.
## 17. State Version
The system must reconstruct authoritative state at any retained turn.
```yaml
state_version:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
turn_id: optional uuid
parent_state_version_id: optional uuid
created_at: timestamp
state_hash: optional string
```
Possible implementation models:
### A. Full snapshots
Simple restore, but duplicates data.
### B. Event sourcing
Excellent auditability, but requires replay.
### C. Hybrid
Validated events plus periodic/current snapshots.
**Selected for v1: Hybrid.** Store validated authoritative events plus efficient state snapshots/cache for normal reads and restore.
## 18. State Change Event
If the hybrid/event model is selected:
```yaml
state_event:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
turn_id: uuid
event_type: string
payload: object
sequence: integer
```
Potential event types:
- entity_created,
- set_entity_status,
- set_entity_attribute,
- fact_added,
- fact_invalidated,
- relationship_added,
- relationship_ended,
- thread_opened,
- thread_resolved,
- current_location_set,
- possession_set,
- scene_set.
Event semantics must be explicit and typed. Prefer unambiguous absolute assignments for mutable values. If incremental operations are ever needed, encode the operation explicitly (for example `increment_value`) rather than relying on one numeric field whose interpretation is implicit.
Events must be schema-validated, semantically checked where deterministic rules exist, and accepted by the application before commit.
## 19. State Proposal
The model's extracted state proposal must be distinct from accepted state.
```yaml
state_proposal:
id: uuid
turn_id: uuid
model: string
raw_output: string
parsed_payload: object
validation_status: accepted | partially_accepted | rejected | repair_required
```
The model must never write directly to authoritative state tables. The production protocol must not depend on AI-DnD-style ambiguous relative deltas; see ADR 010.
## 20. Scene Snapshot
A scene snapshot captures the immediate narrative situation.
```yaml
scene:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
branch_id: uuid
source_turn_start_id: optional uuid
source_turn_end_id: optional uuid
location_id: optional uuid
time_description: optional string
mood: optional string
environment: optional string
participants: [uuid]
significant_objects: [uuid]
current_actions: [string]
visual_notes: [string]
continuity_notes: [string]
```
Scene snapshots support:
- current context,
- narrative continuity,
- future image generation,
- future multi-turn video/storyboard generation.
## 21. Summary
Summaries compress history but never replace authoritative history.
```yaml
summary:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
branch_id: uuid
type: campaign | arc | rolling | turn_range
source_start_turn_id: uuid
source_end_turn_id: uuid
text: string
created_at: timestamp
model: optional string
```
Summaries are derived data. Branch changes must invalidate or lineage-filter incompatible summaries.
## 22. Memory
```yaml
memory:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
branch_scope: optional uuid
source_turn_id: optional uuid
type: string
text: string
authority: string
importance: optional number
embedding_ref: optional string
created_at: timestamp
```
Potential types:
- event,
- character,
- relationship,
- location,
- promise,
- discovery,
- conflict,
- heuristic.
A retrieved memory does not automatically become canon.
## 23. Knowledge Source
A knowledge source is a user-imported local file or manually authored campaign document.
```yaml
knowledge_source:
id: uuid
campaign_id: optional uuid
title: string
source_type: file | manual
classification: canon | reference | inspiration
original_filename: optional string
content_hash: string
enabled: boolean
imported_at: timestamp
metadata: object
```
Initial supported file types should be `.txt` and `.md`.
## 24. Knowledge Chunk
```yaml
knowledge_chunk:
id: uuid
source_id: uuid
sequence: integer
text: string
heading_path: optional string
token_count: optional integer
embedding_ref: optional string
metadata: object
```
Requirements:
- preserve provenance,
- preserve chunk order,
- permit re-indexing,
- never execute imported content.
## 25. Retrieval Record
Every turn should record which memories or knowledge chunks were supplied to the narrator.
```yaml
retrieval_record:
id: uuid
turn_id: uuid
source_kind: memory | knowledge | summary | fact
source_id: uuid
retrieval_method: lexical | semantic | hybrid | forced
score: optional number
rank: integer
```
This lets the prompt inspector answer:
> Why did the narrator know this?
## 26. Prompt Snapshot
```yaml
prompt_snapshot:
id: uuid
turn_id: uuid
created_at: timestamp
system_instructions: text
campaign_context: text_or_structured
state_context: text_or_structured
summary_context: text_or_structured
memory_context: text_or_structured
knowledge_context: text_or_structured
recent_history: text_or_structured
user_input: text
token_accounting: object
```
The physical representation may be compressed or normalized. Reproducibility and inspection are the requirements.
## 27. Media Job
Not required for v1 behavior, but the data model should not prevent it.
```yaml
media_job:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
scene_id: optional uuid
source_turn_start_id: optional uuid
source_turn_end_id: optional uuid
type: image | video | audio | tts | stt
provider: string
model: string
status: queued | running | completed | failed
request_payload: object
created_at: timestamp
completed_at: optional timestamp
```
## 28. Media Asset
```yaml
media_asset:
id: uuid
campaign_id: uuid
media_job_id: optional uuid
scene_id: optional uuid
type: image | video | audio | tts | stt
file_path: string
metadata: object
created_at: timestamp
```
Potential metadata includes prompt, seed, model, workflow, dimensions, duration, character references, and source turn range.
## 29. Export Package
A campaign export should be capable of preserving:
- campaign configuration,
- branches,
- turn graph,
- checkpoints,
- state/events,
- entities,
- facts,
- relationships,
- story threads,
- summaries,
- memories,
- scene snapshots,
- knowledge-source metadata,
- knowledge chunks/source files if selected,
- prompt provenance if selected,
- media metadata,
- media files if selected.
The physical container format remains an implementation choice, but the export must preserve the exact active branch **and active head position**, even when the head is behind a retained tip after Undo. A ZIP containing a database plus manifest remains a strong candidate.
As implemented in M3, the export carries the active branch, the active head
position on it, and each branch's disposition, alongside the whole retained turn
graph. **M4 added the checkpoints**, by the same rule: a position someone chose
to name cannot be recomputed from the turns, because nothing about a turn records
that it was bookmarked. The head and the checkpoints stay independent on import —
a campaign opens where its head says, never at a checkpoint merely because one is
in the file. The governing rule for this package is that an export carries what was
*chosen* and recomputes what is *derived* — and the active head moved from the
second category to the first, because once Undo stops deleting, two campaigns
with identical turns can be being read at different positions and no import can
tell which. An export written before the field existed is opened at its retained
tip, which is the position such a file recorded.
## 30. Deletion vs Archival
The system must distinguish:
- archive,
- detach/disable,
- permanent delete.
Retry, Undo, Restore, and branch switching must not silently perform permanent deletion.
## 31. Authoritative vs Derived Data
### Authoritative
- accepted turns,
- branch lineage,
- campaign configuration,
- accepted facts,
- accepted relationships,
- accepted state events,
- checkpoints.
### Derived
- summaries,
- embeddings,
- semantic indexes,
- lexical indexes,
- some automatically produced scene descriptions.
Derived data should be rebuildable where practical.
## 32. Provenance
Important information should answer:
> Where did this come from?
Potential provenance:
- campaign setup,
- manual user edit,
- accepted narrator turn,
- state extraction,
- imported canon,
- imported reference,
- imported inspiration,
- derived inference.
## 33. Phase 0B Decisions Applied
Phase 0B resolved the foundational data-model questions:
- AI-DnD story lineage/alternate-take machinery is the production starting point.
- The active head is distinct from retained tip history.
- Undo/Redo use head movement; destructive deletion is not part of ordinary history operations.
- Named checkpoints are durable pointers to recoverable head positions.
- State uses a hybrid event + snapshot/cache model.
- State proposals use explicit typed operations with unambiguous value semantics.
- Memories/summaries must be lineage-filtered or lineage-anchored.
- Imported knowledge requires separate source/chunk/index tables rather than overloading Story Cards.
- Scene/media records remain optional derived extensions and must carry source lineage.
- Export/import must preserve active head position as well as the retained history graph.
## 34. Acceptance Criteria
The final v1 data model must support all of these without destructive hacks:
- close/restart/resume exact story,
- Undo/Redo without deleting accepted turns,
- active head behind retained tip,
- branch from an earlier turn while retaining the original future,
- mark abandoned futures/takes retained/disposable,
- create and restore named checkpoints,
- know current characters/locations/relationships/story threads,
- reconstruct earlier authoritative state,
- validate typed state proposals before committing events,
- retrieve old events outside the active context window,
- identify which imported passages informed a turn,
- reconstruct what was sent to Ollama,
- export/import an undone campaign without silently redoing it,
- run fantasy and science-fiction campaigns without schema changes,
- attach future image/video/audio/TTS/STT metadata to scenes or turn ranges without making media authoritative.
## 35. Selected Conceptual Model
```text
Retained Turn/Take Lineage
|
+--> Active branch + movable active head
|
+--> Validated typed state events
| |
| +--> state snapshot/cache
|
+--> lineage-safe summaries/memories
|
+--> prompt/retrieval provenance
|
+--> scene snapshot
|
+--> future optional media records
Separate campaign knowledge subsystem
+--> sources
+--> chunks
+--> FTS/local embeddings
+--> authority/provenance
```
This combines AI-DnD's retained story lineage and snapshot infrastructure with ai-adventure-style explicit event/commit discipline while preserving the project's own specification as the authority.