Files
interactive-story/backend/app/context/builder.py
T
JesseMarkowitzandClaude Opus 5 144406cd48 M11: what the server will actually read
The release-validation milestone, and the thing it had to settle first was
whether any of the earlier evidence meant what it said. M8 measured a deployment
enforcing a 4,096-token input window while the application budgeted 16,384.
Every request returned 200. What Ollama does with the excess is drop the oldest
tokens, and the oldest tokens here are the system block — the narrator's rules
and the campaign canon. A hundred-turn certification against that server would
have looked perfect and proved nothing, which is why this milestone could not
begin with a hundred turns.

So the application asks now. Ollama's window is a property of how a model was
loaded rather than of the request — sending num_ctx is accepted, ignored, and
worse, reloads the model at the server's own default — so the only honest move
is to find out and then tell the truth about it. /api/ps reports what a resident
model is being served with, /api/show what an unloaded one will load with, both
on the same host inference already uses, through the same endpoint policy and
the same TLS trust store. A verified window is a ceiling on the budget; an
unverified one leaves the budget alone and is recorded as unverified in the
turn's own provenance, so an old turn can be asked afterwards whether it was
built against a checked window. There is no third behaviour, and in particular
no hard-coded 4,096: a number the server did not say would be right on one
machine and wrong on the next.

The proof that this is doing something is a campaign whose canon sits at the
front of the prompt, 120 turns of history, and a 4,096-token window. The canon
is still there afterwards and the oldest history is gone. The same campaign
built the old way produces a prompt more than twice the window — the defect,
reproduced, so the fix is measured against it rather than asserted.

Two defects the validation found on its own, and they are the same defect twice:
something was true and nobody was told. A manual state correction of four
changes with one bad reference applied three, returned 201, and said nothing —
while recording the refusal on the audit row nobody reads. It came to light
because the identity diagnostic's own fixture was refused that way and the whole
run proceeded on a campaign with no scene, which would have read as a model
failure. And the narration-length setting moved no number: brief, medium and
long each became one English sentence, while the numeric hint the model actually
reads was derived from the global reply cap and said the same thing for all
three. Both now say what they did.

The other two post-M8 findings are closed as well. The tab said AI D&D, which no
document had ever claimed it did not; it says Interactive Story now, with the
open campaign first, and the name is the owner's decision rather than a
find-and-replace to something narrower than the engine. After an Undo the reader
could not tell where they had landed; the control row now ends with
"Moment 11 · later story ahead", from the server's own answer, in the word the
transcript already uses, with none of head, branch or depth anywhere near it.

The identity diagnostic exists and the root cause does not. That campaign was
destroyed, so no cause can be established — what M11 owes the finding is
something that can classify the next occurrence, and a diagnostic that makes only
the judgements a program can honestly make: duplicate keys, shared names,
protagonist drift, state and context disagreeing. Whether prose misattributed a
line is left to a person reading it beside its prompt, because a regex cannot
read dialogue and one that pretended to would produce exactly the confident wrong
answer this finding is about. Its detectors are proved to fire against a planted
second Alice.

Two entities may still share a display name. That was checked first, as the
finding asked, and left permitted: a mother and a daughter, or a stranger giving
a false name, are ordinary fiction, and refusing them to guard against a model
mistake would refuse the wrong thing. What was missing was that it happened
silently. It is reported now.

Evidence, not inference: a hundred accepted turns against a real narrator with
genuine process restarts; a real browser against the built SPA; a container with
no network at all; a campaign moved into a data directory that never existed.
Each was discarded and re-run whenever the product changed under it, and the runs
that were thrown away are listed in the report with the reason, along with ten
defects in the harnesses themselves — because a harness that has only ever
agreed with itself is not evidence, and two of M8's five harness defects were
masking real ones.

No dependency was added, removed or upgraded. No acceptance test was retired,
relaxed or reclassified. M11 is implemented and verified; it is not accepted, and
there is no release tag.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Qyn3oRd4D6pi72nKBG725B
2026-09-07 14:01:20 -04:00

787 lines
40 KiB
Python

"""Context assembly per AI Dungeon's memory system
(help.aidungeon.com/faq/the-memory-system):
[AI Instructions] always included
[Player Character] always included when the adventure has a persona
[Plot Essentials] always included (classic "Memory")
[Story Summary] always included (manual in Phase 3, auto in Phase 6)
[Used Memories] top-K memory-bank retrievals (Phase 6, when enabled)
[Triggered Story Cards] "World Lore: <entry>", conditional; first dropped when over budget
[Story history] newest actions that fit the remaining token budget
[Author's Note] injected AUTHORS_NOTE_DEPTH actions before the end of history
[Latest player action] (+ script frontMemory right after it, Phase 4)
The list above comes from AI Dungeon's design. The order does not. This module
emits every fixed section first and every changing section after the history,
because prompt caching bills on a shared prefix. A section that changes near the
top of the prompt re-prices everything below it. See the comments on the static
block and the live sections in `build_context`.
"""
from dataclasses import dataclass
import tiktoken
from sqlalchemy.orm import object_session
from .. import contextwindow, derived, models, narrative, summaries, worldstate
from ..knowledge import inject as knowledge_inject
from ..knowledge import records as knowledge_records
from . import encoding, history
AUTHORS_NOTE_DEPTH = 3 # actions from the end of history
# `CARD_BUDGET_SHARE = 0.4` was here, and is gone with the injection it bounded
# (M9). It is named rather than deleted silently because two other places
# reasoned about their own share against it.
NPC_WINDOW = 6 # actions of story searched for NPC trigger words ("in scene")
SEPARATOR = "\n\n"
# Output-length guidance. The endpoint enforces `max_output_tokens` as a hard
# limit, and it truncates the reply mid-sentence when the model reaches it. The
# state block is emitted last, so truncation removes it. Asking the model to
# finish inside the limit prevents the truncation.
LENGTH_HEADROOM = 50 # Tokens reserved from the cap for the state block.
# Models cannot count their own tokens, but they do follow a word budget, so the
# hint states a number of words. English prose averages 0.75 words per token.
WORDS_PER_TOKEN = 0.75
# Models regularly exceed a word budget, and the cap it protects is a hard
# limit. Aiming 10% below the real ceiling leaves room for that overshoot, so it
# does not consume the state block.
LENGTH_BUFFER = 0.90
MIN_LENGTH_HINT_WORDS = 40 # Below this, the hint adds nothing useful.
# A ceiling on its own gives one-sided guidance, and models respond to it
# differently. A verbose model treats it as a limit. A terse model has only the
# instruction to write as much as the moment needs, and it produces two
# paragraphs. Adding a floor turns the guidance into a range, so the same prompt
# produces a similar length from either model. The floor is a share of the
# ceiling so that it can never approach the ceiling.
LENGTH_FLOOR_SHARE = 0.35
# Below this word count, a floor means nothing, because a short turn is the
# correct turn at a tight cap. The wording used at a tight cap is also the
# wording that was measured to preserve the state block, so it is unchanged.
MIN_LENGTH_FLOOR_WORDS = 60
# The floor prevents a collapse to two paragraphs. It does not ask for an essay.
# At a 2400-token cap, the share alone would request a minimum of 555 words. A
# reader who wants longer turns can ask for them in the author's note.
MAX_LENGTH_FLOOR_WORDS = 300
#: M11, post-M8 finding C: what the campaign's own narration-length choice means
#: in words. Until M11 the choice became one English sentence in the campaign's
#: instructions and moved no number at all, while the numeric hint below was
#: derived from the *global* `max_output_tokens` and therefore read identically
#: for brief, medium and long — at the default cap, "must not exceed 506 words,
#: and it should not stop short of about 177" whichever the reader picked. A
#: setting with a visible control and no measurable effect is worse than no
#: setting, because the reader spends trust on it.
#:
#: These bands are (floor, ceiling) in words. They are a design decision made
#: here rather than a ratified requirement — `BUILD-MILESTONES.md` records
#: "Brief ~100-200 words" as a candidate — and they are deliberately wide enough
#: that a scene can breathe inside one.
LENGTH_BANDS = {
"brief": (70, 180),
"medium": (150, 380),
"long": (320, 700),
}
#: Where the floor lands when a band's ceiling has to be cut down to fit the
#: token cap: keep it proportional rather than letting it collide with the
#: ceiling.
BAND_FLOOR_SHARE = 0.5
# Built from the table vendored in `encoding.py`, not fetched: the upstream
# `tiktoken.get_encoding("cl100k_base")` downloads it on first use, and this
# is called on every turn.
# M6: added to the configured reply budget when reserving output space. It
# absorbs the section separators added after budgeting and the drift between
# this tokenizer and the serving model's. Fixed rather than proportional: what
# it covers does not grow with the size of the budget.
OUTPUT_SAFETY_MARGIN = 64
class ContextOverflow(RuntimeError):
"""Raised when protected context alone cannot fit in the token budget.
Protected means the narrator rules, the campaign canon, the authoritative
narrative state, the reader's own input, and the reserve for the reply
(`CONTEXT-AND-MEMORY.md` §30). None of those may be dropped to make room for
old prose, so when they do not fit there is no prompt to build and saying so
is the only honest answer.
"""
def _encoding() -> tiktoken.Encoding:
return encoding.get_encoding()
def count_tokens(text: str) -> int:
return len(_encoding().encode(text))
def truncate_to_last_tokens(text: str, budget: int) -> str:
tokens = _encoding().encode(text)
if len(tokens) <= budget:
return text
return _encoding().decode(tokens[-budget:])
@dataclass
class Section:
label: str
text: str
@property
def tokens(self) -> int:
return count_tokens(self.text)
def length_hint(max_output_tokens: int, narration_length: str = "") -> str:
"""Ask for a turn that fits inside the output cap, stated as a word budget.
Returns an empty string when the cap is too small to state usefully. The
model can exceed the hint, so the hint earns its tokens only when there is
enough room for that overshoot to stay inside the cap.
M11: `narration_length` is the campaign's own choice — `brief`, `medium` or
`long`, or empty for a campaign that never made one. It narrows the range
*within* what the token cap allows; it can never widen it, because the cap
is what the endpoint will actually emit and a hint that asked for more than
that would be asking for a truncated turn.
**The generation budget is deliberately not touched.** Capping
`max_output_tokens` per length would make a brief turn likelier to hit the
endpoint's limit mid-sentence, and the state block is emitted *last* — so
the first thing a truncated reply loses is the turn's state. That is the
trade `BUILD-MILESTONES.md` names when it says "do not hard-truncate prose".
"""
words = int((max_output_tokens - LENGTH_HEADROOM) * WORDS_PER_TOKEN * LENGTH_BUFFER)
if words < MIN_LENGTH_HINT_WORDS:
return ""
band = LENGTH_BANDS.get((narration_length or "").strip().lower())
if band is not None:
band_floor, band_ceiling = band
# The cap still wins. A `long` campaign on a 300-token reply cap gets
# the cap's number, not 700, and the floor moves down with it.
words = min(words, band_ceiling)
floor = min(band_floor, int(words * BAND_FLOOR_SHARE))
tail = (
" Finish the narration and append the state block well inside the limit."
)
if floor < MIN_LENGTH_FLOOR_WORDS:
return (
f"[Hard limit: this turn must not exceed {words} words. Write only as "
f"much as the moment needs — a typical turn is much shorter.{tail}]"
)
return (
f"[Hard limit: this turn must not exceed {words} words, and it should not "
f"stop short of about {floor}. Prefer the lower end of that range unless "
f"the scene genuinely needs more.{tail}]"
)
tail = " Finish the narration and append the state block well inside the limit."
# State the number as a ceiling, never as a budget. In measurements, the
# wording "keep this turn under about N words" read to the model as a target
# to fill. It raised the average from 174 words to 246 across five runs, and
# every hinted run was longer than every unhinted run. The hint therefore
# pushed turns toward the limit it exists to avoid. Naming the number as a
# limit, and adding that a typical turn is much shorter, held the average at
# 170 while still preserving the state block at tight caps.
floor = min(int(words * LENGTH_FLOOR_SHARE), MAX_LENGTH_FLOOR_WORDS)
if floor < MIN_LENGTH_FLOOR_WORDS:
return (
f"[Hard limit: this turn must not exceed {words} words. Write only as "
f"much as the moment needs — a typical turn is much shorter.{tail}]"
)
# Both numbers are bounds, and the wording is deliberately asymmetric. The
# ceiling uses "must not exceed", because the endpoint enforces it. The floor
# uses "should not stop short of". Neither reads as a target, which the
# measurement above shows is what matters. The clause that asks the model to
# prefer the lower end does the job the earlier wording did, which was to
# keep a verbose model away from the ceiling. It now has a number beneath it,
# so a terse model reading the same clause stops at the floor rather than at
# forty words.
return (
f"[Hard limit: this turn must not exceed {words} words, and it should not "
f"stop short of about {floor}. Prefer the lower end of that range unless "
f"the scene genuinely needs more.{tail}]"
)
def render_persona(adventure: models.Adventure) -> str:
"""Returns the Player Character section, or "" when there is no persona.
The three fields are independent. A name alone is enough, a description
alone is enough, and the wording holds together for either. Pronouns are
stated because the summarizer in `memorybank` writes about the protagonist
in the third person, and a model that has to infer a pronoun from a name
will sometimes infer wrongly and then repeat that error in every memory it
writes.
"""
name = adventure.persona_name.strip()
pronouns = adventure.persona_pronouns.strip()
desc = adventure.persona_desc.strip()
if not (name or desc):
return ""
head = f"You are {name}" if name else ""
if head and pronouns:
head += f" ({pronouns})"
# Joined with a space, not `SEPARATOR`: this is one short paragraph about
# one character, and a blank line inside it reads as two unrelated notes.
body = " ".join(part for part in (f"{head}." if head else "", desc) if part)
return f"Player character:\n{body}"
def _script_memory(adventure: models.Adventure) -> dict:
"""Script-provided memory overrides (populated by Phase 4 scripting)."""
state = adventure.script_state if isinstance(adventure.script_state, dict) else {}
memory = state.get("memory")
return memory if isinstance(memory, dict) else {}
def _history_text(action: models.Action) -> str:
"""Returns an AI turn as the model should see it in replayed history.
Replayed history is **prose only**. The protocol block is not reconstructed
into it, and the M5 corrective pass is why (review Finding 4).
Replaying the block was meant to teach the model the output format by
example. What it actually did was put a second, older account of the world
into the same prompt as the authoritative one, with nothing marking which
governed. A fact the reader had explicitly withdrawn through a manual
correction was dropped from the state section and then handed straight back
in the history section, as an accepted event, phrased exactly as the model
had first asserted it. C04 requires a correction to reach the narrator's
context; a correction the next prompt contradicts has not reached it.
Two other things were wrong with it. The blocks are implementation
metadata, not story, and every other consumer of stored text — memory,
summaries, export, the transcript — treats an action's text as prose. And a
turn's accepted events are a record of what was true *then*, which is
precisely what a later correction, retcon or invalidation revises.
The format instruction survives without the examples: `EMIT_RULE` carries a
worked example in the system block and `EMIT_REMINDER` repeats the demand
last, where recency is strongest.
"""
return action.text
def _memory_line(memory: dict) -> str:
"""One retrieved memory, marked with its authority (M6)."""
mark = " [inferred]" if memory.get("authority") == "heuristic" else ""
return f"-{mark} {memory['text']}"
def _canon_section(adventure: models.Adventure) -> str:
"""The campaign's own rules, rendered for the system block.
Canon is configuration (C01, J03): the campaign writes what is true and what
is forbidden, and both the prompt and the validator read the same field.
Putting it in the system block is what makes C01 a narration-time constraint
as well as a validation-time one — the model is told the rule rather than
only refused after breaking it.
"""
canon = adventure.campaign_canon
if not isinstance(canon, dict):
return ""
lines: list[str] = []
rules = canon.get("rules")
if isinstance(rules, list):
lines += [f"- {rule}" for rule in rules if isinstance(rule, str) and rule.strip()]
forbidden = canon.get("forbidden_status_changes")
if isinstance(forbidden, list):
for rule in forbidden:
if isinstance(rule, dict) and rule.get("from") and rule.get("to"):
lines.append(
f"- Nothing that is {rule['from']} can become {rule['to']}."
)
if not lines:
return ""
body = "\n".join(lines)
return f"Campaign canon (these are true and may not be contradicted):\n{body}"
def _visible_npcs(actions: list[models.Action], stat_schema: dict) -> dict[str, str]:
"""Returns the NPCs whose trigger words appear in the recent story.
These are the NPCs in scene, and the prompt includes stats for them only.
The result maps an NPC id to its display name.
`actions` holds only the most recent actions. See `NPC_WINDOW`.
"""
recent = SEPARATOR.join(a.text for a in actions).lower()
visible: dict[str, str] = {}
for npc_key, ndef in (stat_schema.get("npcs") or {}).items():
if not isinstance(ndef, dict):
continue
if any(trigger in recent for trigger in worldstate.npc_triggers(ndef, npc_key)):
visible[npc_key] = worldstate.npc_name(ndef, npc_key)
return visible
def match_cards(cards: list[models.StoryCard], window_text: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Returns one record per matched story card, naming the keyword that matched.
Matching follows AI Dungeon's rules. It ignores case, respects spaces, and
matches partial words, so "boat" matches "boats".
Public since Phase 18b: `memorybank.cast_brief` runs the same rule over the
block it is about to summarize, so that the summarizer is told who the
characters in that stretch of story are. One rule, one implementation.
"""
haystack = window_text.lower()
matched = []
for card in cards:
for key in (k.strip().lower() for k in card.keys.split(",")):
if key and key in haystack:
matched.append(
{"id": card.id, "name": card.name, "keyword": key, "entry": card.entry}
)
break
return matched
def build_context(
adventure: models.Adventure,
settings: models.Settings,
memory_bank: dict | None = None,
exclude_action_id: int | None = None,
knowledge: knowledge_records.Result | None = None,
window: contextwindow.Window | None = None,
) -> tuple[str, str, dict]:
"""Returns (system_text, story_text, context_report). `memory_bank` is the
result of memorybank.retrieve_memories (None when the bank is off);
`exclude_action_id` omits one action from the story (see history.py).
M7: `knowledge` is the result of `knowledge.retrieval.retrieve` — the ranked
imported passages, before any budget has been applied. It arrives already
retrieved for the same reason `memory_bank` does: retrieval may need an
embedding call, this function is synchronous, and a prompt builder that can
make network requests is a prompt builder that can fail halfway through a
prompt. None means the campaign has no library, or the caller did not ask.
M11: `window` is what the inference server was found to actually accept
(`contextwindow.probe`), and it arrives the same way and for the same
reason — asking the server is a network call and this function does not make
those. A **verified** window is a ceiling on the configured budget, which is
the whole of M11's no-silent-overflow invariant: the prompt this returns
cannot be longer than what the runtime will read, so `llama.cpp` never gets
the chance to drop the system block off the front. `None` means nobody
checked, and then the configured budget stands and the report says it was
not verified.
"""
# M11: the budget every section below is priced against. Capped by what the
# server was verified to accept; the configured value when nothing was
# verified, or when the reader has asked for something smaller.
budget = contextwindow.effective_budget(settings.context_token_budget, window)
script_mem = _script_memory(adventure)
# M7: priced before anything else, because the answer changes what is left.
# `plan` prices only the protected half — the untrusted-data rule and any
# always-in-force Canon — and both are counted with the system block below.
knowledge_plan = knowledge_inject.plan(
knowledge if knowledge is not None else knowledge_records.Result(),
count_tokens,
budget,
)
# ----- The static block, which is identical on every turn -----
# This ordering exists to reduce cost. Prompt caching matches a prefix. The
# endpoint reuses the prompt up to the first byte that differs from the
# previous request, and no further. A section that changes near the top
# therefore re-prices everything below it, and what sits below it is the
# story history, which is most of the prompt. Sections that change from turn
# to turn go after the history, among the live sections. Placing them there
# also gives them the most recency, which is why `EMIT_REMINDER` goes last.
system_sections: list[Section] = [Section("narrator", settings.narrator_prompt.strip())]
# RPG world state (Phase 12): the instructions for reporting changes. The
# live values go into a live section below. The guide derived from the
# schema and the emit rule do not change while the scenario is unchanged.
stat_schema = adventure.scenario.stat_schema if adventure.scenario else None
has_ws = worldstate.has_schema(stat_schema)
persona_name = adventure.persona_name.strip()
# M5: the typed-event protocol replaces the delta rule for every campaign,
# with or without an inherited stat schema. State is no longer an opt-in
# RPG layer — a story has entities, places and possessions whatever genre it
# is, so the rule is unconditional.
system_sections.append(Section("state_rule", narrative.extract.EMIT_RULE))
canon_text = _canon_section(adventure)
if canon_text:
system_sections.append(Section("campaign_canon", canon_text))
# M7: the imported-knowledge framing rule, and any Canon the campaign has
# marked as always in force. Both go here, directly *below* the campaign's
# own canon, which is the authority order stated in words in
# `knowledge.classes.KNOWLEDGE_RULE` and reinforced by the position.
#
# In the system block rather than among the live sections, for two reasons.
# They change only when the reader edits their library, so they belong in
# the cached prefix; and being counted with the protected sections is what
# makes an over-large always-include a `ContextOverflow` with an explanation
# rather than a prompt that silently loses its history.
for protected_section in knowledge_plan.protected:
system_sections.append(
Section(protected_section.label, protected_section.text)
)
if isinstance(script_mem.get("context"), str) and script_mem["context"].strip():
system_sections.append(Section("script_context", script_mem["context"].strip()))
if adventure.ai_instructions.strip():
system_sections.append(Section("ai_instructions", adventure.ai_instructions.strip()))
# Phase 18. This sits in the static block because only the user can edit it,
# so it never changes mid-story and stays inside the cached prefix. It is
# emitted whether or not the adventure has an RPG layer: an adventure with
# no stats still has a protagonist, and that is the case the persona was
# added for.
persona_text = render_persona(adventure)
if persona_text:
system_sections.append(Section("persona", persona_text))
if adventure.memory.strip():
system_sections.append(
Section("plot_essentials", f"Plot essentials:\n{adventure.memory.strip()}")
)
# ----- Live sections, which hold everything that changes -----
# This code builds them here and places them after the history further down.
# They are ordered from least to most volatile, so a turn that changes only
# the fastest-moving section leaves the others cached. The summary is
# rewritten every few turns. Lore changes with the scene. The retrieved
# memories change on most turns, and the stat values change on nearly every
# turn. `world_lore` is added below, because the history window determines
# which cards trigger and that window is not known yet.
# M6: the summary the *current lineage* is entitled to, not whatever was
# written last. A summary is derived data anchored to the story it covers,
# so an Undo or a divergence makes an old one ineligible rather than
# leaking it into a story it does not describe (E03, `app/summaries.py`).
db = object_session(adventure)
summary_row = summaries.current(db, adventure) if db is not None else None
summary_text = summary_row.text.strip() if summary_row is not None else ""
summary_section = (
Section("story_summary", f"Story summary:\n{summary_text}")
if summary_text
else None
)
memories_section = None
if memory_bank and memory_bank.get("used"):
# M6: an inference must not read as a record. A heuristic memory is
# marked in the prompt itself, because the narrator decides what to
# treat as established from what it is shown, and an unlabelled guess
# sitting beside accepted history is how a guess becomes canon
# (`CONTEXT-AND-MEMORY.md` §14). Authoritative state changes still come
# only from the M5 event path, whatever a memory says.
lines_text = "\n".join(_memory_line(m) for m in memory_bank["used"])
memories_section = Section(
"used_memories",
"Memories from earlier in the story. Lines marked [inferred] are "
"interpretation, not established fact — do not treat them as "
f"settled truth:\n{lines_text}",
)
world_state_section = None
refusal_note = ""
# M5: the authoritative narrative state, as the model is shown it. Read from
# the campaign's live document, which head movement keeps pointed at the
# position being read — so an undone story is described by the state it had
# then, not by the state it reached later.
state_block = narrative.render.for_prompt(adventure.narrative_state)
if state_block:
world_state_section = Section("narrative_state", state_block)
# Corrections for the previous AI turn only. A refusal the model has
# already had one chance to fix is stale, and repeating it every turn
# would price a correction into the whole rest of the adventure.
recent = history.tail(adventure, NPC_WINDOW, exclude_action_id)
last_ai = next((a for a in reversed(recent) if a.type == "ai"), None)
if last_ai is not None:
refusal_note = narrative.extract.render_rejections(last_ai.state_rejections)
authors_note_text = adventure.authors_note.strip()
if isinstance(script_mem.get("authorsNote"), str) and script_mem["authorsNote"].strip():
authors_note_text = script_mem["authorsNote"].strip()
authors_note = f"[Author's note: {authors_note_text}]" if authors_note_text else ""
front_memory = ""
if isinstance(script_mem.get("frontMemory"), str):
front_memory = script_mem["frontMemory"].strip()
length_note = length_hint(settings.max_output_tokens, adventure.narration_length)
# The live sections sit below the history, but they are still part of the
# prompt, so they still count against the budget. `world_lore` is the
# exception, because the code below budgets it out of `available`.
reserved = (
sum(s.tokens for s in system_sections)
+ sum(
s.tokens
for s in (summary_section, memories_section, world_state_section)
if s is not None
)
+ count_tokens(authors_note)
+ count_tokens(front_memory)
+ count_tokens(length_note)
+ count_tokens(narrative.extract.EMIT_REMINDER)
+ count_tokens(refusal_note)
)
# ----- M6: the output reserve, and what happens when it does not fit -----
#
# `context_token_budget` is the whole window the model is given, so the
# narrator's reply has to be subtracted from it before any history is
# chosen. Until M6 it was not: the builder spent the entire budget on input
# and left the reply to fit in whatever the endpoint had left, which is a
# truncated turn on a model whose window is the budget
# (`CONTEXT-AND-MEMORY.md` §32, acceptance test F04).
#
# The margin covers what is added after this arithmetic — the separators
# between sections, and the difference between our tokenizer's count and the
# serving model's. It is small and fixed rather than proportional, because
# what it absorbs does not scale with the budget.
output_reserve = max(0, settings.max_output_tokens) + OUTPUT_SAFETY_MARGIN
protected = reserved + output_reserve
if protected >= budget:
# Failing here is the point. The alternative — carrying on with a token
# or two of history — builds a prompt that is known to overflow, and
# the reader gets a truncated reply with no explanation. §32: "fail
# gracefully if protected context alone is too large."
raise ContextOverflow(
f"The protected context needs {protected} tokens "
f"({reserved} of prompt plus {output_reserve} reserved for the "
f"reply) but the context budget is {budget}. "
+ (
"That budget is what this server was found to accept, so raising "
"the setting alone will not help — load the model with a larger "
"window. Or lower the maximum reply length, or shorten the "
"campaign's canon, instructions and persona."
if budget < settings.context_token_budget else
"Raise the context budget, lower the maximum reply length, or "
"shorten the campaign's canon, instructions and persona."
)
)
available = budget - protected
# ----- M7: retrieved imported knowledge, out of a share of `available` -----
#
# Chosen here, before the history window is sized, because what knowledge
# spends is what the history does not get: a window fetched against the
# whole of `available` would read turns there was never room for.
#
# Bounded rather than trimmed afterwards. The passages that fit are selected
# against a share of the budget and the rest is recorded as dropped, so the
# section stops growing when the budget is exhausted however large the
# library becomes. Always-included Canon is not spent from this — it was
# priced into `reserved` above — so Reference and Inspiration cannot crowd
# out a standing campaign rule, and none of them can reach the current
# state, the reader's input or the reply reserve, which are all above.
knowledge_sections = [
Section(section.label, section.text)
for section in knowledge_inject.select(knowledge_plan, available)
]
knowledge_spent = sum(
section.tokens + count_tokens(SEPARATOR) for section in knowledge_sections
)
available_after_knowledge = max(0, available - knowledge_spent)
# Only the newest actions can reach the prompt, because the code below
# either truncates the text to `available` tokens or stops at the budget.
# Fetch a window that is provably larger than that and no larger. Otherwise
# a long adventure reads its whole history on every turn and uses only the
# end of it.
actions = history.window_covering(
adventure, available_after_knowledge, count_tokens, exclude_action_id
)
# ----- Story cards: legacy, and no longer part of the narrator's prompt (M9)
#
# Until M9 a keyword-triggered story card was injected here as
# `World Lore: <entry>`, taking up to 40% of what was left after the
# imported knowledge had been placed.
#
# `IMPORTED-KNOWLEDGE-DESIGN.md` §73 settles that Story Cards are not the
# production imported-knowledge store and, in as many words, that they "must
# not become an alternate untracked path around the new knowledge
# authority/provenance rules". That is exactly what this was. A card entry
# arrived in front of the narrator as a world fact with:
#
# * no class — nothing said whether it was Canon, Reference or Inspiration,
# so nothing framed how far the narrator could rely on it;
# * no visibility — no narrator-only distinction at all;
# * no source, no hash, no lifecycle, nothing to disable it with;
# * no browser surface, since M8 removed the editor — so a reader could
# neither see it nor switch it off;
# * and no row in the context inspector, which renders `knowledge` and
# never rendered `cards`.
#
# It also competed with imported Canon for one budget, which is the
# arrangement M7 spent a milestone separating.
#
# M9's decision, recorded in the milestone report: story cards are
# **compatibility-only legacy data**. Nothing is deleted. The rows stay, the
# `/api/story-cards` endpoints stay, the bundle carries them out and back so
# a round trip destroys nothing, and `memorybank.cast_brief` still reads them
# as the summariser's character roster — a roster names who is on stage so a
# memory says "Aldric" rather than "he", it never reaches the narrator, and
# every memory written from it is authority-classified by the application
# afterwards. What stops is the one path that asserted campaign facts to the
# narrator without any of the controls §73 requires.
#
# `cards` stays in the report and is now always empty for a new turn.
# Removing the key would break the historical snapshots that have one, which
# M9 has just made portable: an old turn's evidence says story cards were
# included, and it must go on saying so.
card_records: list[dict] = []
lore_section = None
used = 0
# ----- Story history: newest first until the remaining budget is spent -----
history_budget = available_after_knowledge - used
included_actions: list[models.Action] = []
spent = 0
oldest_truncated = False
for action in reversed(actions):
# Budget against the text as it appears in the prompt, which includes
# the state block when this adventure tracks world state.
rendered = _history_text(action)
tokens = count_tokens(rendered) + count_tokens(SEPARATOR)
if spent + tokens > history_budget:
if not included_actions:
# Even the newest action alone is over budget: hard-truncate it.
included_actions.append(
models.Action(
adventure_id=action.adventure_id,
type=action.type,
text=truncate_to_last_tokens(action.text, history_budget),
)
)
oldest_truncated = True
break
included_actions.append(action)
spent += tokens
included_actions.reverse()
# ----- Assemble the story text, with the author's note near the end -----
# Append each AI turn's state block again. The app strips it before storage,
# and the recent history has to show the model the pattern to follow.
texts = [_history_text(a) for a in included_actions]
note_sections: list[Section] = []
if authors_note:
pos = max(0, len(texts) - AUTHORS_NOTE_DEPTH)
before, after = texts[:pos], texts[pos:]
if before:
note_sections.append(Section("history", SEPARATOR.join(before)))
note_sections.append(Section("authors_note", authors_note))
note_sections.append(Section("recent_history", SEPARATOR.join(after)))
else:
note_sections.append(Section("history", SEPARATOR.join(texts)))
# The live sections, ordered from least to most volatile. See the comment
# where they are built. They go below the history so that the history stays
# cached, and above the final sections so that those stay last.
#
# M7 inserts the retrieved knowledge between the lore and the memories, in
# ascending authority: Inspiration, then Reference, then imported Canon,
# then the story's own memories, and the current authoritative state last of
# all. A model weights what it read most recently, so the section it reads
# last is the one that settles a conflict — which is the ordering
# `knowledge.classes.KNOWLEDGE_RULE` states in words. Both are needed. C05
# is not satisfied by section order alone, and a stated order the layout
# contradicts is worse than either.
for live in (
summary_section,
lore_section,
*reversed(knowledge_sections),
memories_section,
world_state_section,
):
if live is not None:
note_sections.append(live)
if front_memory:
note_sections.append(Section("front_memory", front_memory))
# Place the length hint just above the emit reminder, which keeps the last
# position. The length budget applies to the narration, and the reminder
# applies to the block that follows it, so this is also the order in which
# the model acts.
note_sections.append(Section("length_hint", length_note))
# A correction for the previous turn sits directly above the reminder to
# emit a block, which is the instruction it modifies.
if refusal_note:
note_sections.append(Section("state_refusals", refusal_note))
# The emit rule sits in the system block, far from where the model
# generates text, so repeat it last where it has the most effect.
note_sections.append(Section("state_reminder", narrative.extract.EMIT_REMINDER))
story_sections = [s for s in note_sections if s.text]
system_text = SEPARATOR.join(s.text for s in system_sections if s.text)
story_text = SEPARATOR.join(s.text for s in story_sections)
all_sections = [s for s in system_sections if s.text] + story_sections
report = {
"sections": [
{"label": s.label, "text": s.text, "tokens": s.tokens} for s in all_sections
],
"prompt": {"system": system_text, "story": story_text},
# M6: the numbers the reader needs to answer "how much did each part
# cost, and what was left for the reply?" (F04, F05). `available` is
# what the history was actually allowed to spend after everything
# protected was subtracted.
"tokens": {
"total": count_tokens(system_text) + count_tokens(story_text),
"budget": budget,
"configured_budget": settings.context_token_budget,
"output_reserve": output_reserve,
"protected": reserved,
"available_for_history": available,
"history_spent": spent,
},
# M11: what the server was found to accept, and how. `verified` false
# means nobody could check — the prompt was built to the configured
# budget and may be larger than the runtime will read. This travels in
# the stored snapshot, so a turn taken against an unverified window is
# identifiable afterwards rather than indistinguishable from a safe one.
"window": {
"verified": (window.verified if window is not None else False),
"tokens": (window.tokens if window is not None else None),
"source": (window.source if window is not None else contextwindow.UNKNOWN),
"model_max": (window.model_max if window is not None else None),
"detail": (window.detail if window is not None else "not checked"),
"capped": (
window is not None
and window.verified
and window.tokens < settings.context_token_budget
),
},
"cards": card_records,
"memories": memory_bank,
# M6: which summary was used, and which stretch of story it covers, so
# "what history did that summary cover?" is answerable from the record
# rather than by guessing (F05, F06).
"summary": summaries.provenance(summary_row),
# M6: whether background derived work is currently failing for this
# campaign. A dead memory bank is visible here rather than only in a log
# nobody reads (F08).
"derived": derived.report(db, adventure.id) if db is not None else [],
# M7: every imported passage this turn was given — which source, which
# file, which class, which visibility, which passage, how it was found,
# what each path scored it, and what it cost — plus what was considered,
# what was set aside as redundant, and what there was no budget for.
#
# The rendered text travels in this record, not a reference to the chunk
# row it came from. That is what makes a historical turn's evidence
# survive the source being deleted
# (`IMPORTED-KNOWLEDGE-DESIGN.md` §49-50): the snapshot says what the
# narrator was actually shown, and it goes on saying it.
"knowledge": knowledge_inject.report(knowledge_plan),
"history": {
"included": len(included_actions),
# The count covers the whole story rather than the window fetched
# above. Insights reports how many of the total actions it
# included, so this number must be the real total.
"total": history.count(adventure, exclude_action_id),
"oldest_truncated": oldest_truncated,
},
"settings": {
"model": settings.model,
"api_mode": settings.api_mode,
"temperature": settings.temperature,
"max_output_tokens": settings.max_output_tokens,
},
}
return system_text, story_text, report