v0.7.2 — a leg that is part of the row, the deck the sheet prints, regions not miles per hour, and a Division you read left to right

Gitea#17 — a 45° leg is an end of the west-to-east row, so backing into a cut
through a curve's south leg no longer couples it back to front. The same
assumption left a crew's own cut standing when it pulled out through a leg,
which is the "cars left behind" report we had failed to reproduce.

Gitea#14 — every count is docs/Deck cards5.xlsx. Track halved, and the Q12
office doubling and Gap 12 industry tripling both come out with it: they were
measured against a deck with twice the track, and keeping them at the sheet's
track count wipes out the reefer chain entirely. 84 rows now match card for
card; the ten Safety, Event and Inspection cards it adds are not built and are
held out. Cards the sheet no longer lists are dealt zero copies rather than
deleted, so their rules stay implemented.

Gitea#15 — RAR reversed it: a rail may stop dead against its neighbour and the
placement is legal. What must hold is that no train crosses the gap, which was
already true and is now pinned against the reported board.

Gitea#3 — the printed speeds are scenery. A card costs one Stage per printed
region and where a train STARTS is what varies; Fast/Slow is read on Hilly
alone. Entering a one-region card behind another is a collision now, which is
what ABS exists to prevent, and ABS no longer holds trains silently.

Gitea#18 — the Division draws as one row, west to east, with no office-area
detail. East is finally always to the right.

Closes #3
Closes #14
Closes #15
Closes #17
Closes #18

test/track.test.ts

@@ -540,6 +540,100 @@ describe('placement and drop-off', () => {
     assert.ok(!canPlaceAt(area, at(-1, 1), straight()), 'an east-west straight cannot meet a 45° leg');
   });
 
+  describe('a rail that stops dead against its neighbour (Gitea#15)', () => {
+    /**
+     * REPORTED, THEN REVERSED. The issue first read "if a card is placed in that space, it MUST
+     * connect", against a right-hand curve laid at (1,-1) with an Ice House above it and a turnout
+     * with a north-facing leg below. **RAR reviewed it and ruled the other way (2026-08-26): the
+     * placement is fine, and a stub like that has a use — a siding to park cars on.**
+     *
+     * "We need to confirm, however, that trains are not allowed to traverse from the turnout below
+     * to that right-hand curve since the tracks do not connect." That is what these tests are: the
+     * rule lives in MOVEMENT, not in placement.
+     *
+     * The save cannot carry this any more — Gitea#14 took the deck from 206 cards to 121, so its
+     * card ids no longer exist and the history stops at the first `card.play`. The geometry is what
+     * mattered, and it is rebuilt here directly.
+     */
+    /** A Modifier card — an Ice House. Not track: no ports on any edge. */
+    const modifierCard = (): TrackCard => ({
+      geometry: { kind: 'modifier', modifier: 'iceHouse' },
+      baseOperationalRail: false,
+      standing: [],
+      standingWest: 0,
+      facility: null,
+      modifiers: [],
+      enhancements: [],
+    });
+
+    /** A Grocer's Warehouse — a Facility, so a plain east-west through track. */
+    const warehouse = (): TrackCard => ({
+      geometry: { kind: 'facility', facility: 'grocersWarehouse' },
+      baseOperationalRail: true,
+      standing: [],
+      standingWest: 0,
+      facility: null,
+      modifiers: [],
+      enhancements: [],
+    });
+
+    /**
+     * The reported district. `withCurve` puts the disputed right-hand curve on the square; without
+     * it, the square is empty and the placement itself is under test.
+     *
+     * The turnout's leg goes NORTH on the `nw_se` diagonal; the curve is `ne`, which is `ne_sw` and
+     * has no south port at all. Two reasons the two do not join, either of which is enough.
+     */
+    const board = (withCurve: boolean): OfficeArea =>
+      areaFrom(
+        {
+          [coordKey(at(0, -1))]: turnout({ stem: 'w', through: 'e', diverge: 'n' }),
+          [coordKey(at(0, 0))]: officeCard(),
+          [coordKey(at(1, 0))]: warehouse(),
+          [coordKey(at(2, -1))]: modifierCard(),
+          ...(withCurve ? { [coordKey(at(1, -1))]: curve('ne') } : {}),
+        },
+        at(0, 0),
+      );
+
+    it('allows the reported placement, which connects on one side and nothing else', () => {
+      // RAR's ruling. The curve joins the warehouse to its east; its north leg faces an Ice House
+      // that carries no rail, and the turnout below faces its portless south edge. All legal.
+      assert.ok(canPlaceAt(board(false), at(1, -1), curve('ne')), 'the reported play was refused');
+    });
+
+    it('will not let a train cross from the turnout below onto that curve', () => {
+      // The confirmation the issue actually asks for. Running west out of the Office and into the
+      // turnout, the 45° leg goes north — and stops at the curve's blank south edge.
+      const dests = reachableDestinations(ctxFor(board(true)), at(0, 0), 'w');
+      assert.ok(!has(dests, 1, -1), 'a train drove across rails that do not meet');
+    });
+
+    it('still reaches the curve from the side that DOES join', () => {
+      // Otherwise the test above would pass on a card that is simply unreachable, which proves
+      // nothing. East of the curve is the warehouse, and east-west edges always meet.
+      const dests = reachableDestinations(ctxFor(board(true)), at(1, 0), 'w');
+      assert.ok(has(dests, 1, -1), 'the curve was unreachable from the side that joins');
+    });
+
+    it('will not let a train cross a north edge onto a card with no rail at all', () => {
+      // The Ice House above. A Modifier is scenery beside the rails — Jesse confirmed a rail may
+      // point at a building — so what stops a train is the same `joins` test, not a placement rule.
+      const dests = reachableDestinations(ctxFor(board(true)), at(1, 0), 'w');
+      assert.ok(!has(dests, 2, -1), 'a train drove into an Ice House');
+    });
+
+    it('still allows an exit that faces a BLANK square', () => {
+      // Unchanged by the reversal, and the reason a district can grow at all: a turnout laid on the
+      // Running Track with nothing yet beside its diverging leg is a perfectly good play.
+      const area = areaFrom({ [coordKey(at(0, 0))]: officeCard() }, at(0, 0));
+      assert.ok(
+        canPlaceAt(area, at(0, 1), turnout({ stem: 'w', through: 'e', diverge: 'n' })),
+        'a turnout whose leg faces open space was refused',
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
   it('refuses a card that connects to nothing', () => {
     const area = areaFrom({ [coordKey(at(0, 0))]: officeCard() }, at(0, 0));
     assert.ok(!canPlaceAt(area, at(3, 3), straight()), 'orphaned track is never legal');