v0.4.9f — an Extra starts where you put it, a train card is never discarded

The 0.6.2 change, ported to the playtest line. Three from the v0.4.9e gameplay-testing round —
Gitea#4 extras did not start where the player said, #6 train cards could be discarded, #7 four
train cards had the wrong coach counts — plus two bugs found underneath #4. Gitea#2 is diagnosed
but NOT fixed; it needs a ruling, and the reasoning is in TODO.md.

GITEA#4 — AN EXTRA STARTS WHERE THE PLAYER PUTS IT. Both Division Points are offered now, and the
START decides the direction rather than the number: an odd westbound Extra placed at the WEST end
would otherwise leave the Division on its first move having crossed nothing and be paid for the
run. At an Interchange or a Control Point the player picks the direction. The Interchange start is
a YARD, off the running line, which is what makes the Superintendent clause work — placing an
Extra there can never force a collision, a guaranteed one holds it for another Stage, and a
potential one is the Superintendent's to rule on, which are §8.1's two existing answers. Where an
Extra may start is a new setting in the New Game dialog, defaulting to what the engine already did
so this build does not change under its testers mid-line.

FOUND UNDERNEATH IT, both already shipping: an Extra started away from a Division Point could
never be given a consist and ran empty, so the Control Point start has been broken since it was
added; and collide left destroyed trains' transits on the Mainline card, permanently poisoning
that card for every later train.

THE MAINLINE CARDS ARE DEALT FROM THE PRINTED DECK NOW, without replacement. They were drawn from
the nine types with replacement, so a Division could hold two Interchanges — and "an Extra may
start at the Interchange if one is on the board" only reads as a rule if the board holds at most
one. This re-deals every seed, so both published replays were retired and re-recorded.

GITEA#6 — A TRAIN CARD IS NEVER DISCARDED, Timetabled and Extra alike. No forcing mechanism was
needed: nothing discardable plus a hand over the limit leaves exactly one legal way to end the
turn, and playing a train is unconditionally legal, so a hand of four cannot trap anyone. The hand
panel says so on the train, and the blocked end-turn button changes its wording.

GITEA#7 — COACH COUNTS. 1/2 Crack Limited 3 -> 2, 5/6 The Sparrow 2 -> 3.

WHAT DIFFERS FROM THE MAIN LINE. The car-placement round rotation test that accompanies #7 there
arrived with the 0.6 multiplayer work and does not exist here, so there was nothing for the
coach-count change to follow. src/web/main.ts and test/web.test.ts needed hand-resolution: this
line's New Game dialog has neither the mode radios nor the victory dials, so only the Extra-start
parts were taken. The content.ts comment pass came across whole; main's TODO documentation item
did not, since this line keeps its own TODO.

623 tests pass, tsc clean, site builds.
This commit is contained in:
Jesse.Markowitz
2026-08-22 21:42:27 -04:00
parent 7c35e002af
commit e255076b5c
29 changed files with 3521 additions and 2163 deletions
+284 -37
View File
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ import { describe, it } from 'node:test';
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
import { advance, pump } from '../src/engine/advance.ts';
import { applyIntent, areaOf, check } from '../src/engine/apply.ts';
import { EXPEDITE_FAULT_PENALTY, HAND_LIMIT, STAGES_PER_DAY, lengthProfile, TOTAL_ROLLING_STOCK } from '../src/engine/content.ts';
import { applyIntent, areaOf, check, isBeingMadeUp } from '../src/engine/apply.ts';
import { EXPEDITE_FAULT_PENALTY, HAND_LIMIT, MAX_CONSIST, STAGES_PER_DAY, lengthProfile, TOTAL_ROLLING_STOCK } from '../src/engine/content.ts';
import { legalActions } from '../src/engine/legal.ts';
import { createGame } from '../src/engine/setup.ts';
import { developerBot } from '../src/sim/bot.ts';
import type { CrewTray, GameConfig, GameState } from '../src/engine/state.ts';
import { railFacingOf } from '../src/engine/state.ts';
import type { CrewTray, DivisionNode, GameConfig, GameState } from '../src/engine/state.ts';
import { coordKey, railFacingOf } from '../src/engine/state.ts';
const baseConfig = (over: Partial<GameConfig> = {}): GameConfig => ({
mode: 'solitaire',
@@ -872,15 +872,20 @@ describe('the history says WHY a train moved, and says it truthfully', () => {
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('an Extra starts where its number sends it, or at a Control Point', () => {
describe('an Extra starts where the player puts it (Gitea#4)', () => {
/**
* REPORTED: "Extras should start at Eastern or Western Division point based on their numbers. Even
* trains run to the east (start at western DP), odd run to the west (start at eastern DP). They
* can also start at a control point (any office except whistlepost) at player's choice."
* REPORTED, v0.4.9e: "When extras are played the player doing so may choose where the extra
* starts. They may choose either division point. And if the interchange mainline card has been
* played, they may start the extra on that card and choose the direction from there. If there is
* potential for conflict with other trains in that area the superintendent may hold the extra."
*
* Every Extra used to launch eastbound from the West Division Point, hardcoded, with the
* simplification flagged in a comment — so half the Extras ran the wrong way and the Control Point
* option did not exist at all.
* This SUPERSEDES the earlier ruling these tests used to assert — "the number decides, like
* everything else on the timetable" — for Extras only. The number still decides for a timetabled
* train. The reason the two cannot both hold: an odd (westbound) Extra placed at the WEST end
* would leave the Division on its first move having crossed nothing, and be paid for the run.
*
* So: the start decides the direction. A Division Point runs the train away from itself; in the
* middle of the railroad — an Interchange, a Control Point — the player says which way.
*/
const pending = (trainNumber: number, tier?: 'depot' | 'station'): GameState => {
const s = game(11);
@@ -898,6 +903,14 @@ describe('an Extra starts where its number sends it, or at a Control Point', ()
return tray;
};
/** Turn one Mainline card into an Interchange, and say which node it is. */
const withInterchange = (s: GameState): number => {
const i = s.division.nodes.findIndex((n) => n.kind === 'mainline');
const node = s.division.nodes[i]!;
if (node.kind === 'mainline') node.card = 'interchange';
return i;
};
it('stops for the decision instead of launching the train itself', () => {
const s = pending(17);
assert.equal(s.clock.phase, 'newTrain');
@@ -908,36 +921,46 @@ describe('an Extra starts where its number sends it, or at a Control Point', ()
);
});
it('sends an odd Extra west from the EASTERN Division Point', () => {
// §2.3 — odd runs west. It therefore starts at the end it runs away from.
it('offers BOTH Division Points, not the one the number would dictate', () => {
const s = pending(17);
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 17, atSeat: null }).ok);
const tray = started(s);
assert.equal(tray.direction, 'west');
assert.equal(tray.position.at === 'divisionPoint' && tray.position.side, 'east');
const sides = legalActions(s, 0)
.filter((i) => i.type === 'newTrain.startExtra' && i.start?.kind === 'divisionPoint')
.map((i) => (i.type === 'newTrain.startExtra' && i.start?.kind === 'divisionPoint' ? i.start.side : ''));
assert.deepEqual([...sides].sort(), ['east', 'west']);
});
it('sends an even Extra east from the WESTERN Division Point', () => {
const s = pending(18);
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, atSeat: null }).ok);
const tray = started(s);
assert.equal(tray.direction, 'east');
assert.equal(tray.position.at === 'divisionPoint' && tray.position.side, 'west');
it('runs an Extra AWAY from the Division Point it was placed at, whatever its number', () => {
// X17 is odd. Under the superseded rule it could only ever start at the East end and run west.
for (const [side, direction] of [['west', 'east'], ['east', 'west']] as const) {
const s = pending(17);
const r = applyIntent(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 17, start: { kind: 'divisionPoint', side },
});
assert.ok(r.ok, `the ${side} Division Point was refused: ${r.ok ? '' : r.code}`);
const tray = started(s);
assert.equal(tray.direction, direction, `an Extra at the ${side} end must run ${direction}`);
assert.equal(tray.position.at === 'divisionPoint' && tray.position.side, side);
}
});
it('refuses a Whistle Post, which is not a Control Point', () => {
const s = pending(18);
assert.equal(s.officeAreas.get(0)!.tier, 'whistlePost');
assert.equal(
check(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, atSeat: 0 }),
'NOT_A_CONTROL_POINT',
);
it('refuses a Whistle Post, which is not a Control Point, at every setting of the house rule', () => {
for (const extraStart of ['divisionPointsOnly', 'ownOffice', 'anyOffice'] as const) {
const s = pending(18);
s.config = { ...s.config, houseRules: { ...s.config.houseRules, extraStart } };
assert.equal(s.officeAreas.get(0)!.tier, 'whistlePost');
const code = check(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'office', seat: 0 }, direction: 'east',
});
assert.ok(code !== null, `a Whistle Post was allowed under ${extraStart}`);
}
});
it('starts at a Control Point when the player picks one, taking an A/D track', () => {
// Upgrading the Office is what buys this: a Depot is a Control Point, a Whistle Post is not.
const s = pending(18, 'depot');
const r = applyIntent(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, atSeat: 0 });
const r = applyIntent(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'office', seat: 0 }, direction: 'west',
});
assert.ok(r.ok, `starting at the Depot was refused: ${r.ok ? '' : r.code}`);
const tray = started(s);
const area = s.officeAreas.get(0)!;
@@ -948,16 +971,240 @@ describe('an Extra starts where its number sends it, or at a Control Point', ()
'the Extra did not start on the Office card',
);
assert.ok(area.adOccupancy.includes(tray.id), 'it did not take an A/D track');
assert.equal(tray.direction, 'east', 'an even Extra still runs east from wherever it starts');
// The point of the change: an EVEN Extra running WEST, because the player said so.
assert.equal(tray.direction, 'west', 'the direction the player chose was not honoured');
});
it('needs a direction anywhere that is not an end of the Division', () => {
const s = pending(18, 'depot');
assert.equal(
check(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'office', seat: 0 } }),
'NO_DIRECTION_CHOSEN',
);
});
it('honours the extraStart house rule for Office starts, and never for the shared ground', () => {
for (const [extraStart, code] of [
['divisionPointsOnly', 'OFFICE_STARTS_NOT_ALLOWED'],
['anyOffice', null],
] as const) {
const s = pending(18, 'depot');
s.config = { ...s.config, houseRules: { ...s.config.houseRules, extraStart } };
assert.equal(
check(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'office', seat: 0 }, direction: 'east',
}),
code,
`office start under ${extraStart}`,
);
// The Division Points belong to nobody, so no setting ever closes them.
assert.equal(
check(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'divisionPoint', side: 'west' } }),
null,
);
}
});
it('starts at an Interchange in the players yard, not out on the running line', () => {
const s = pending(18);
const node = withInterchange(s);
const r = applyIntent(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'mainline', node }, direction: 'east',
});
assert.ok(r.ok, `the Interchange was refused: ${r.ok ? '' : r.code}`);
const tray = started(s);
const card = s.division.nodes[node]!;
assert.equal(tray.direction, 'east');
assert.deepEqual(tray.position, { at: 'mainline', index: node });
assert.ok(card.kind === 'mainline' && card.holding?.includes(tray.id), 'it is not in the yard');
assert.equal(card.kind === 'mainline' && card.transits.length, 0, 'it was put on the running line');
});
it('refuses any Mainline card that is not an Interchange', () => {
const s = pending(18);
const plains = s.division.nodes.findIndex((n) => n.kind === 'mainline');
const node = s.division.nodes[plains]!;
if (node.kind === 'mainline') node.card = 'plains';
assert.equal(
check(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'mainline', node: plains }, direction: 'east' }),
'NOT_AN_INTERCHANGE',
);
});
it('may be started at an Interchange however busy the card is — the yard forces no collision', () => {
const s = pending(18);
const node = withInterchange(s);
const card = s.division.nodes[node]!;
// Nose to tail with opposing traffic. §7: placing here still must not force a collision.
if (card.kind === 'mainline') {
card.transits.push({ tray: 'tray9', stagesRemaining: 2, stagesTotal: 2, direction: 'west' });
}
assert.equal(
check(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'mainline', node }, direction: 'east' }),
null,
);
});
/**
* §7's last clause, and the reason the Interchange start is modelled as a yard at all: "If there
* is potential for conflict with other trains in that area the superintendent may hold the extra."
*
* Jesse's split: a GUARANTEED collision holds the train at the Interchange for another Stage and
* it tries again; a POTENTIAL one is the Superintendent's to rule on. Those are exactly §8.1's
* two answers, so the Extra highballs out of the yard through `evaluateClearance` — the same
* check a train leaving a Division Point goes through — rather than through anything new.
*/
describe('highballing out of the Interchange yard', () => {
/** A pending X18 sitting in the yard of an Interchange, with the terrain pinned. */
const inYard = (): { s: GameState; node: number; tray: CrewTray } => {
const s = pending(18);
const node = withInterchange(s);
const r = applyIntent(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'mainline', node }, direction: 'east',
});
assert.ok(r.ok, `the Interchange was refused: ${r.ok ? '' : r.code}`);
s.clock.phase = 'mainline';
s.movedThisPhase = new Set();
return { s, node, tray: started(s) };
};
const card = (s: GameState, node: number): Extract<DivisionNode, { kind: 'mainline' }> => {
const n = s.division.nodes[node]!;
assert.equal(n.kind, 'mainline');
return n as Extract<DivisionNode, { kind: 'mainline' }>;
};
it('pulls out onto the card at the next Mainline Phase when the Subdivision is clear', () => {
const { s, node, tray } = inYard();
advance(s);
const n = card(s, node);
assert.deepEqual(n.holding, [], 'it never left the yard');
assert.ok(n.transits.some((t) => t.tray === tray.id), 'it is not on the running line');
});
it('is held in the yard by a facing train, and tries again the next Stage', () => {
const { s, node, tray } = inYard();
// Westbound, against an eastbound Extra: §8.1 calls that an absolute bar, not a judgment call.
card(s, node).transits.push({ tray: 'facing', stagesRemaining: 2, stagesTotal: 2, direction: 'west' });
s.trays.set('facing', {
id: 'facing', trainNumber: 3, trainIsExtra: false, engineAt: 0, consist: [],
direction: 'west', position: { at: 'mainline', index: node }, movesUsed: 0,
});
const r = advance(s);
assert.equal(r.needsInput ?? false, false, 'a guaranteed collision is not a question to ask');
assert.equal(s.clock.pendingDecision, null);
assert.ok(card(s, node).holding?.includes(tray.id), 'it was not held in the yard');
assert.ok(
!card(s, node).transits.some((t) => t.tray === tray.id),
'it pulled out in front of a train coming the other way',
);
assert.ok(s.trays.has(tray.id), 'the Extra was destroyed rather than held');
// AND IT TRIES AGAIN. The Extra waits in the yard, not on the pending list, so once the road
// clears the next Mainline Phase takes it out with no further intervention.
s.trays.delete('facing');
card(s, node).transits = [];
s.clock.phase = 'mainline';
s.movedThisPhase = new Set();
advance(s);
assert.deepEqual(card(s, node).holding, [], 'it did not try again once the road was clear');
assert.ok(card(s, node).transits.some((t) => t.tray === tray.id), 'it never pulled out');
});
it('puts a following train to the Superintendent rather than holding it automatically', () => {
const { s, node, tray } = inYard();
// Same direction: §8.1's judgment call, which is what "may hold the extra" means.
card(s, node).transits.push({ tray: 'ahead', stagesRemaining: 2, stagesTotal: 2, direction: 'east' });
s.trays.set('ahead', {
id: 'ahead', trainNumber: 4, trainIsExtra: false, engineAt: 0, consist: [],
direction: 'east', position: { at: 'mainline', index: node }, movesUsed: 0,
});
const r = advance(s);
assert.equal(r.needsInput, true, 'the phase must stop and ask');
assert.equal(s.clock.pendingDecision?.train, tray.id);
assert.equal(s.clock.pendingDecision?.occupiedBy, 'ahead');
// HOLD keeps it in the yard.
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, s.clock.superintendent, { type: 'mainline.clearance', allow: false }).ok);
advance(s);
assert.ok(card(s, node).holding?.includes(tray.id), 'the Superintendent held it and it left anyway');
});
});
/**
* FOUND BY PLAYING IT, not by the tests above: an Extra started anywhere but a Division Point was
* never offered a car and ran empty.
*
* `isBeingMadeUp` asked only "is this tray standing at a Division Point", which was the whole
* truth while that was the only place to build a train. The Control Point start has therefore
* shipped since it was added with a train that could not be loaded, and the Interchange start
* would have shipped the same way — against Jesse's report, which says an Extra started at the
* Interchange "would be Loaded with cars".
*/
describe('an Extra started away from a Division Point can still be made up', () => {
const fill = (s: GameState): string[] => {
for (let i = 0; i < MAX_CONSIST + 1; i++) {
const options = legalActions(s, s.clock.currentActor ?? 0).filter((a) => a.type === 'newTrain.placeCar');
if (options.length === 0) break;
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, s.clock.currentActor ?? 0, options[0]!).ok);
}
return started(s).consist.map((c) => c.type);
};
it('takes a consist in the Interchange yard', () => {
const s = pending(18);
const node = withInterchange(s);
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'mainline', node }, direction: 'east',
}).ok);
assert.ok(fill(s).length > 0, 'the Extra was never offered a car and would have run empty');
});
it('takes a consist at a Control Point', () => {
const s = pending(18, 'depot');
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'office', seat: 0 }, direction: 'east',
}).ok);
assert.ok(fill(s).length > 0, 'the Extra was never offered a car and would have run empty');
});
it('stops being made up the moment it starts running', () => {
// Otherwise a train out on the Mainline could be handed cars from the Division Yard — the
// "cars appearing on a train nobody was making up" bug `isBeingMadeUp` exists to prevent.
const s = pending(18);
const node = withInterchange(s);
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, {
type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 18, start: { kind: 'mainline', node }, direction: 'east',
}).ok);
const tray = started(s);
s.clock.phase = 'mainline';
s.movedThisPhase = new Set();
advance(s);
assert.equal(s.trays.get(tray.id)?.beingMadeUp, undefined, 'a running train is still being made up');
assert.equal(isBeingMadeUp(s.trays.get(tray.id)!), false);
});
});
it('replays a save written before the choice existed exactly as it meant it', () => {
/**
* A save is a seed and a list of intents, so an intent whose meaning moves is a save that
* quietly replays as a different game. The legacy shape carried only `atSeat`: null meant the
* Division Point the NUMBER sent it to, running in the number's direction.
*/
const s = pending(17);
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 17, atSeat: null }).ok);
const tray = started(s);
assert.equal(tray.direction, 'west', 'the legacy intent stopped meaning what it meant');
assert.equal(tray.position.at === 'divisionPoint' && tray.position.side, 'east');
});
it('takes the Extra off the pending list once, whichever end it started from', () => {
const s = pending(17);
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 17, atSeat: null }).ok);
const at = { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 17, start: { kind: 'divisionPoint', side: 'east' } } as const;
assert.ok(applyIntent(s, 0, at).ok);
assert.deepEqual(s.pendingExtras, []);
assert.equal(
check(s, 0, { type: 'newTrain.startExtra', trainNumber: 17, atSeat: null }),
'NO_EXTRA_PENDING',
);
assert.equal(check(s, 0, at), 'NO_EXTRA_PENDING');
});
});