v0.8.2
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Jesse.MarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
3befc420da |
v0.8.2 — every district opens on a Depot, and the docs are pages now
A second-digit bump for a playtest read back against the save file. Nine questions were asked of one three-Day game; three were bugs, three were the rules working and undocumented, three were decisions. Every save on the test server was replayed against this build BEFORE release, which is how the cost of each rule was known before it was chosen rather than discovered after. EVERY DISTRICT OPENS ON A DEPOT. A Whistle Post has one A/D track and is not a Passenger Facility, so the opening of every game was spent unable to work a passenger and one arrival away from a collision. Two A/D tracks and passengers from Stage 1 now; "Players start with Whistle Posts, not Depots" is the harder game, set when the game is created. The deck follows the choice — starting on Depots the four Depot upgrade cards are left out, because an upgrade must be to the next tier and a Depot card at a table of Depots is a dead draw. How much easier it is showed up as a test failure rather than an argument: the cue-coverage pool needed widening from 24 seeded games to 60 before it held one collision. NO SAVE WAS STRANDED BY IT, which took care. This is the one house rule that changes how a game is DEALT rather than how it plays, so replaying a save under the wrong opening is a different railroad from intent one — silently, with no error. `withSavedOpening` fills it on the replay paths ONLY. Putting it in the resolver instead made a fresh Cutthroat game deal Whistle Posts and read as Custom, which is how the distinction was found. THREE BUGS, ALL REPORTED FROM ONE GAME AND ALL CONFIRMED ON ITS SAVE. An Office held TWO TRAINS ON ONE A/D TRACK. The capacity test passed with nothing standing, the train the Interlocking had been holding at the Limits was moved into the free slot, and the arriving train was pushed in after it without anyone asking again whether there was room — so the collision §8.3 calls for never happened. The held train keeps priority; the newcomer now takes the consequence it would have met had the held train arrived first. THE HISTORY FROZE, permanently, and the log cap was not really the cause. Each seat's "what have I sent you" bookmark was an INDEX into an array the game trims, so once a seat's bookmark reached the limit the slice returned nothing for the rest of the game — at a different moment per seat, because each holds its own. That game's log ended at exactly the cap. Lines carry a sequence number now, which survives trimming; proven by pushing twice the cap through a simulated seat. §8.1 ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION TWICE. "Trains may pass" returned `clear` before the Subdivision was looked at, so a train entering a Double Track was released however busy the rest of it was — that, not anything about Control Points, is what let Train 8 out with no ruling. And a train standing at an Office was invisible to the scan, so one about to re-enter the very Subdivision being entered counted for nothing. Capacity is the test, not presence: a Depot with a track free is not in the way; a Whistle Post with its one track taken is. THINGS THAT HAPPENED SILENTLY NOW SAY SO — a train held against a facing one, a train released from the Limits (a side effect of somebody else's arrival, so it simply appeared at the Office), and the train an Interlocking is holding, whose explanatory tooltip has existed since #99 with NO renderer ever reading the flag. WHERE A MOVE IS REFUSED, AND WHY. `exploreMoves` decides where the rails go and the pick-up restrictions are enforced afterwards in `check`, so a square the rails reached and the card forbade was reachable, un-offered, and absent from the block list with nothing said. Those squares are blocked with the rule that blocks them now, and the reasons are got by ASKING `check` rather than re-deriving: a second implementation of the rules is exactly the failure the block list exists to avoid. A train may also always recover its own caboose — X13 prints "may drop but not pick up anything", and a train needs its caboose to be made up, so one that parted with it could never legally leave again. RULES DECIDED IN SEPTEMBER AND APPLIED HERE. A Modifier must sit square against its host, no diagonals. A passenger Modifier may not be played at a Whistle Post. Both were built, measured, held back for a fortnight so a playtest could finish, and applied now. A Second Section costs its card: `SECOND_SECTION` was declared in content.ts and never dealt, so the action was free and the bot ordered 26 accidental ones in a measured round. The card is dealt and spent — gating on a card the deck never holds would have deleted the mechanic rather than fixed it. THE DOCUMENTATION IS A SET OF PAGES, not five text files served as text/plain — a card reference is mostly tables, and as plain text a table is rows of pipes. Markdown is still the one copy; the build renders it, and publishes the .md beside each page. No Markdown library: this project has no runtime dependencies and one would be a poor first. The pages add what Markdown cannot carry without drifting — a nav across the set, a contents list built from the headings actually rendered, an anchor on every heading, a 70-character measure, and tables that are tables. They print as ink on paper. The references caught up with the rules, checked rather than assumed: two statements had gone from stale to misleading (the Quickstart told a new player to "get a Depot down as soon as one appears"), and four rules nobody could look up are written down — the Office tier table, §8.1 in practice, what the Circus Train pays for, and that a Realignment can be a card with no legal target. Adding one card to the deck reshuffles every seeded deal, which broke five fixtures. Each was a seed meaning "a game like this" — TODO #84, exactly — so seeds moved and pools widened rather than assertions weakening, and the clearance fixture pins its terrain the way `enhancements.test.ts` already does. The three published replays were re-recorded. Closes TODO #40, #42a, #108, #109 and #110. 1046 fast tests and 35 sim tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MUizFYCMHRWhbWwXhp7WPR |
||
|
Jesse.MarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
d5445badcc |
v0.7.9.5 — two answers to one question, and the copy nobody read
Both faults are in what 0.7.9.4 had just built, and both are the same shape: a second copy of an answer that agreed with the first until it didn't. #96 — the §3.3 vote has no actor, and the screen named one anyway. The vote is PARALLEL: every un-voted seat may vote at any moment, in any order, one refusal ends it, and `apply.ts` says where it accepts one that there is no actor to be. The turn chart named the last seat to move before the timetable ran out — no more claim on the vote than anybody else — directly above a tally correctly showing three seats outstanding. The cause is worth more than the symptom. `currentActor(game)` (`web/game.ts`) guarded on `status !== 'active'`; `currentActorOfState` (`sim/view.ts`), added the same day in #95 and the one the frame calls, did not, so it handed back whatever `clock.currentActor` was left holding. The view now carries the guard and `currentActor` delegates to it. That matters more than the tidiness: `currentActor` is what REFUSES an intent, so a screen answering differently tells the table to wait on a player the server would turn away. The fourth of this class after Gitea#21, #22 and #94 — but the first found by asking a view helper its question in a state the game is not `active` in, which is the generalisation and is cheaper than finding the fifth the same way. #97 — narration reaches a seat once, by one path. `Frame.lines` carried the whole log on every push to every seat, and nothing read it: `RemoteSession` accumulates from `push.lines` alone and its `lines()` returns that accumulator, so the log was serialised into every frame, grew all game, and was discarded on arrival while `linesSince` sent the same text correctly beside it. The duplicate was masking a bug rather than merely wasting bandwidth. `connect()` cleared `lastFrame` but not `sentLines`, so a reconnecting seat was told "nothing new since your last push" while the browser it answered had just reloaded from an EMPTY accumulator — the history panel came back blank, mid-game, with the server holding the whole log. So the two halves are one change, and the plan's instruction taken alone ("stop passing the full game log into `frameFor()`") would have deleted a real behaviour rather than a duplicate. Every remaining reader of `Frame.lines` was checked before the field was emptied: all of them are the solitaire and replay path, which builds Frames through `snapshot()` directly and never goes near a session. One test was wrong before the code was. The first draft of the reconnect test connected inside its own fixture, so both sides of the comparison were the empty array and it passed against the broken server. Each test now asserts its premise is non-empty before comparing. Also: `docs/plans/jitsi-common-board.md` is committed. It was never added — not ignored, just missed — while TODO.md cites it twice as the plan for all of v0.8.0 and the last two releases were built from it, so a clone got a TODO pointing at a file that did not exist. 917 tests pass, up from 909. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Y5boPxP6JHRYMm8adXaF5R |
||
|
Jesse.MarkowitzandClaude Opus 5
|
45580d8b61 |
v0.7.3 — a game that asks before it ends, and a results screen worth reading
Two issues off the tracker, and they are halves of one thing: the end of a game. Neither ships on the 0.4.9 line — Jesse's call, that line may be complete and these are not fixes people mid-playtest need. EXTENDED PLAY (#11). The official result is settled at the original game length and never changes: in a five-Day game extended to eight, the winner is whoever led at the end of Day 5. Extending grants exactly one Day and the question is put again at the end of it — solitaire the player decides alone, multiplayer it is unanimous and one refusal ends it there. Only days-based endings offer it; a §3.4 collision breach is final, during an extended Day exactly as during the scheduled game. It could not be a client-side change. `check` refused every intent once `status` left `active`; the server never loads a `finished` game back into memory; and a save is `{ seed, config, history }` replayed through the engine, so a "continue" the history does not record did not happen. Hence a fourth status, `awaitingExtension`, and a `game.extend` intent. `config.days` never moves — `extraDays` counts the borrowed Days and `official` freezes the outcome, the standings and the statistics at the first ending. THE RESULTS SCREEN (#16). `GAME OVER — revenueFloor` was `outcome.reason`, an internal enum interpolated into the page at the one moment the game has the player's whole attention. Every reason now has a sentence with the game's own numbers in it. Around it: the result and winner, standings, the rules the game was dealt under, a per-player breakdown, and the railroad — trains through the Division and how many worked en route, loads made up and broken, passengers, cars switched, trains destroyed. It shares the Day-end dialog's blocks rather than reimplementing them, and stays reopenable so continuing does not cost you the results. Statistics are folded, not recorded: `state.tally` counts what the event stream says happened, hooked at `applyIntent` and `advance` because `reduce` never sees the phase driver's events — and those are the interesting ones. Nothing in the rules reads it, and it rides the Frame, so multiplayer gets the same numbers as solitaire from one implementation. THREE BUGS FOUND IN TESTING, all of which would have shipped: - a saved game containing a vote could not be resumed (NO_ACTOR). A history is a flat Intent[] with no seat recorded; the replay derives who acted from the turn order, which cannot work for an intent every seat may send in any order. `game.extend` carries its voter, checked against the authenticated seat. - an all-bot game hung on the question for ever. `driveBots` loops on `currentActor`, null the moment the game stops, so it cannot cast a vote, and the bot-vote driver returned early with no humans to follow. - the balance harness became unbounded — `test/sim.test.ts` went from under a second to never finishing. `randomBot` took another Day about half the time, so every seeded game ran to playGame's 50,000-turn cap. Fixed in the driver, not in a policy, so it holds for bots not yet written. All three have regression tests. 832 tests pass, against 793 before this change. NOT BUILT, and a correction. #16's own comment said `trainStoodStill` "is emitted per Stage, so a run of them is exactly the sat-on-a-siding streak". It is not: reading advance.ts, it fires once per game and only for a train whose profile sets `stopEarnsPoint` — the X18 Circus — with `stopPointClaimed` preventing a second. The streak was built, rendered "1 Stage at (0,0)", and was taken out again. There is no per-Stage "this train did not move" signal in the engine, so "longest an engine sat on a siding" needs one first; TODO.md #36 records what it would take, and the Circus set-up is reported instead. Badges remain the second pass #16 asks for (TODO.md #33), and because the statistics are derived rather than recorded, that pass can add any of them retroactively to games already played and saved. Extended play has not yet been played at a real table (TODO.md #35): the multiplayer vote has only been driven through `session.intent`, never through two browsers. Closes #11 Closes #16 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EAgJSmeV8zrMh55Mj85ESb |