v0.8.0.10 — playtest fixes: clearance rulings, the log, the map, and a save file

From the first two multiplayer playtests of v0.8.0.9, each traced before fixing.

The engine:

- A train on a card BEHIND the one departing no longer triggers a clearance
  ruling or an opposite-direction bar (#26). Reproduced from the exported
  save: X15 was held over X18 behind it, and X18 then collided into the full
  Whistle Post. Games in progress holding a ruling the engine no longer asks
  for will not resume (28 of 40 recorded four-seat games); shipped as is at
  Jesse's call.
- `mainlineModified` carries the card's previous kind, so the log can say
  what a Realignment converted (#27).

The screen:

- The turn chart and the Division map name the player whose move is on
  screen while bot turns replay, not the live actor (#25).
- The owning player's name is no longer outlined by the turn arrow's stroke,
  which made it unreadable (#24).
- A Mainline card flashes on the map when a Realignment changes it (#28).
- The history is held back with the board and revealed step by step, instead
  of arriving whole while the board is still catching up (#29).
- A ruling made by holding the office reads "Superintendent Player X" (#30),
  and no line names a player twice (#31).
- A seated player can download their own game as a save file: the play
  page's Save replay button, fed by GET /api/save?token=… (#32). The StartOS
  action cannot do this — an action result is text only.

Closes #24
Closes #25
Closes #26
Closes #27
Closes #28
Closes #29
Closes #30
Closes #31
Closes #32

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017nnuCv8UodHucFfx3LWEoX
This commit is contained in:
Jesse.Markowitz
2026-09-15 22:44:20 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 76c6e103b3
commit 4adf149ba5
17 changed files with 607 additions and 41 deletions
+9 -5
View File
@@ -151,10 +151,14 @@ describe('the tally counts every event exactly once (Gitea#16)', () => {
it('splits Revenue into what was earned and what was given back', () => {
// Reconciliation is the real assertion and it holds for any game, earned or not: gained minus
// lost IS the score the engine kept. Seed 42 is named because it is one where Revenue actually
// lost IS the score the engine kept. Seed 44 is named because it is one where Revenue actually
// moves in both directions — it earns 1 and gives back 5 to a collision — so the two halves are
// being told apart rather than both sitting at zero.
for (const seed of [1, 7, 42]) {
//
// It was seed 42 until v0.8.0.10. That game's collision was the Superintendent holding a train over
// one BEHIND it (Gitea#26); with the ruling gone the collision is too, and seed 42 now earns 5 and
// loses nothing — a better game and a vacuous test. The seed moved, not the assertion.
for (const seed of [1, 7, 44]) {
const { state } = playKeepingEvents(seed);
const me = state.tally.byPlayer[0]!;
assert.equal(
@@ -163,10 +167,10 @@ describe('the tally counts every event exactly once (Gitea#16)', () => {
`seed ${seed}: gained minus lost does not reconcile with the score the engine kept`,
);
}
const { state } = playKeepingEvents(42);
const { state } = playKeepingEvents(44);
const me = state.tally.byPlayer[0]!;
assert.ok(me.revenueGained > 0, 'seed 42 earned nothing — the gained half is not being counted');
assert.ok(me.revenueLost > 0, 'seed 42 lost nothing — the lost half is not being counted');
assert.ok(me.revenueGained > 0, 'seed 44 earned nothing — the gained half is not being counted');
assert.ok(me.revenueLost > 0, 'seed 44 lost nothing — the lost half is not being counted');
});
it('records a Circus set-up as the one-off it is, not as a streak', () => {